The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2011, 07:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 340
No RI called in St Louis game

Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | CHC@STL: Quade is ejected arguing a play at second - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

That seemed to come awfully close to RI. What are the guidelines?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2011, 10:08pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry1953 View Post
Why don't you tell us why you think this is close to interference?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2011, 10:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
From the PBUC: "In sliding to a base, the runner should be able to reach the base with his hand or foot."

I think he could have complied with that but he didn't reach for the base.*

But wait, there is more: "A runner who, in the judgement of the umpire, contacts or attempts to make contact with a fielder with a slide or roll block that is not a bona fide effort to reach and stay on the base may be called out for interference and, when appropriate a double play may be called.
Any different change in direction by the runner to contact the fielder would be considered interference.
If a runner hits the dirt, slides, and rolls, it does not constitute a rolling block unless the runner leaves his feet and makes contact with the fielder before the runner slides on the ground. If the initial contact is with the fielder instead of the ground for the purpose of breaking up a double play, it is a roll block."

I have INT on that play but I don't ump in the pros.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2011, 11:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Legal slide.

He COULD have reched the base. He doesn't actually have to as long as he's close enough to do it IF.

This isn't kiddie ball.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2011, 11:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SC
Posts: 74
Intention is 100% clear as day in that video. Im shocked it was not called.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2011, 11:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Why don't you tell us why you think this is close to interference?
Because Holliday could not have touched the base with his left hand as he was almost standing up as he went past it. At the time he made contact with F6 his body position was such that he could not have have touched the bag, nor was there a time after he made contact where he could have touched the bag.

Last edited by Larry1953; Sat Jul 30, 2011 at 11:47pm.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 01:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 253
This. is. really. tough. to. type...

But I actually agree w/ Larry. Horizontally, he was within reach of the bag, but vertically he was too upright where he could don't have reached down to touch the bag until after he was past it.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 06:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheway View Post
Intention is 100% clear as day in that video. Im shocked it was not called.
Intention is 100% irrelevant. I'm shocked you would mention it.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 08:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry1953 View Post
Because Holliday could not have touched the base with his left hand as he was almost standing up as he went past it. At the time he made contact with F6 his body position was such that he could not have have touched the bag, nor was there a time after he made contact where he could have touched the bag.
He was close enought to the base to be able to touch it. That's all that's required in pro ball.

Lower levels it's a different issue, but in pro it's OK.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 09:06am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
I agree. I think he slid late, but the intention of the sliding runner is to ALWAYS break up the double play. The contact was not above the knee and the runner was close to second base. I had no problem with it watching the game live and still have no problem with the play a day later.

I do still think Quade's a complete a$$hat, though. His shelf life as a ML manager won't be too long, though.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 09:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 340
I don't see Holliday make a bona fide attempt to reach the bag.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 10:03am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry1953 View Post
I don't see Holliday make a bona fide attempt to reach the bag.
He doesn't have to. He only has to "be able to" reach with a hand or a foot.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 12:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry1953 View Post
I don't see Holliday make a bona fide attempt to reach the bag.
Same as RichMSN
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 02:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Rich Ives and RichMSN have the correct call. It's Pro Ball, people, not youth, NCAA or HS ball. All the runner has to do in Pro Ball is be able to reach the base with a hand, he does not have to do it.

In NCAA and FED, this would be a double play because we have either have an illegal slide or deliberate attempt to take out a player. In youth ball, I hope the same for safety's sake.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2011, 05:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Rich Ives and RichMSN have the correct call. It's Pro Ball, people, not youth, NCAA or HS ball. All the runner has to do in Pro Ball is be able to reach the base with a hand, he does not have to do it.

In NCAA and FED, this would be a double play because we have either have an illegal slide or deliberate attempt to take out a player. In youth ball, I hope the same for safety's sake.
Hence the "neighborhood play". The middle fielders need some relief if that much latitude is given to the runner or it is unlikely they would make it through a season. The problem is, slo-mo HD replay easily shows the neighborhood play, but RI is completely umpire's judgment. Surely RI will be called before the season is over and I'd like to compare that (eventual) call with this one. It would have been nice to have seen Holladay make at least a hint of a gesture to touch the bag to satisfy what has been quoted out of the umpire's manual.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No interference called in the STL game. Illini_Ref Baseball 0 Thu Jul 28, 2011 03:45pm
Game 5 Called! IRISHMAFIA Softball 4 Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:48pm
NBA: Foul should have been called at end of Game 4? kdays78 Basketball 8 Sat May 31, 2008 03:35am
The best or the biggest game you have called Carroll G. Abbey Softball 7 Wed Jan 07, 2004 06:29pm
Fire NFL crew from St. Louis/Tampa Game Darin Football 4 Thu Jan 27, 2000 07:45pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1