|
|
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011, 09:40pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting non-call of BI when the batter fell across HP and made the catcher's throw to 2B more difficult.
The announcers (Orel) are telling us that the catcher should have initiated contact and that you have to have contact for interference to be called, like when F4 or F6 is trying to make the throw to 1B (to complete the DP. Thanks to recent posts on this site I now know that not to be true. Considering the call that was made in the Texas-ASU game with B/RI called for interference with no contact, I actually think the PU missed the rightful call of BI on this one since the batter completed his swing and ended up over the plate and altered F2's throw. Agreed? 
|
|
Wed Jun 22, 2011, 08:58am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong
|
|
Wed Jun 22, 2011, 10:37am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Right Call or Wrong Call | Johnny Ringo | Football | 24 | Thu Oct 15, 2009 06:19pm |
| The right call or the correct call? | Nevadaref | Basketball | 9 | Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21am |
| ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 28 | Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm |
| To call or not to call foul ball | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am |
| More Pacers/Pistons call/no call | OverAndBack | Basketball | 36 | Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm |
Hybrid Mode
