The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 12, 2011, 07:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
And now Nomah, the TH, is making an idiot of himself.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 12, 2011, 08:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 175
I must be dense.

How do you have BI on ball 4? Ball 4 moves the batter to first on the award and forces the R1 to second.

The supposed BI occurred after Ball 4. I can see sending the R1 back to 2nd, but...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 12, 2011, 09:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 13
I am no umpire but I do not understand this being interference. Is it not customary that a batter in the right hand batter box crosses in front of the plate when his is walked?

I know baseball has some rules that the masses do not understand. Is this one of them?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 12, 2011, 09:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Always good to know the THs in college baseball are as stupid as the ones in college softball. NCAA should ban Nomar from TV. They do have the right to approve announcers, and Nomar should be disapproved.

If nothing else, it's interference because the umpire SAID it was interference. It doesn't make any difference if there actually WAS interference. There was in the judgment of the umpire at that moment. Nomar needs to shut up.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 12, 2011, 11:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 770
Nomah may be (is) an idiot but but I don't see how they got this outcome. Unless you see an intentional pause and shoulder turn into the catcher. Then maybe the BR should be out and return the runner.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 13, 2011, 06:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
For those less interested in commentators than the play:

1. The pitch was ball 4, so the batter became a runner and no longer liable for batter interference.
2. He might, however, be liable for runner interference if he intentionally hindered a throw.
3. Although F2 threw down, there was no play on R1 because he was forced to advance by the award to the batter. It's always on the defense to know the situation and whether a play is possible.
4. Since BR did not intentionally interfere -- he was permitted to move toward 1B to take his award, and shouldn't reasonably have expected a throw -- he was not called for INT.
5. The umpires presumably allowed the play to stand because F2 risked a throw without possibility of a play and there was no infraction by the BR.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 13, 2011, 08:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
For those less interested in commentators than the play:

1. The pitch was ball 4, so the batter became a runner and no longer liable for batter interference.
2. He might, however, be liable for runner interference if he intentionally hindered a throw.
3. Although F2 threw down, there was no play on R1 because he was forced to advance by the award to the batter. It's always on the defense to know the situation and whether a play is possible.
4. Since BR did not intentionally interfere -- he was permitted to move toward 1B to take his award, and shouldn't reasonably have expected a throw -- he was not called for INT.
5. The umpires presumably allowed the play to stand because F2 risked a throw without possibility of a play and there was no infraction by the BR.
1-4, I agree.
5 - See, there's the problem... they DID rule interference. they DID NOT allow the play to stand. Either R1 was ruled out and BR put on first, or BR was ruled out and R1 returned to first. TV did an awful job telling us which runner was left on first base after the play, so I'm not completely sure. I THINK it was the batter.

I was happy for the rally-killing out here... but the umpire in me doesn't understand how this outcome was what they came up with.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 13, 2011, 08:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
1-4, I agree.
5 - See, there's the problem... they DID rule interference. they DID NOT allow the play to stand. Either R1 was ruled out and BR put on first, or BR was ruled out and R1 returned to first. TV did an awful job telling us which runner was left on first base after the play, so I'm not completely sure. I THINK it was the batter.

I was happy for the rally-killing out here... but the umpire in me doesn't understand how this outcome was what they came up with.
Oh, I guess I misunderstood your first post. I thought you were saying that R1 remained on 3B after the throwing error by the defense.

I can't see how they could have called out R1 here under any circumstances. They must have ruled runner INT on the BR and called him out, returning R1 to 1B.

The box score should have it.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Texas v. Nebraska end of game john_faz Football 40 Mon Dec 14, 2009 09:14am
Kansas/Texas Game Sit. wildcatter Basketball 14 Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:53am
Did anyone see the end of the A&M vs Texas game tonight. mightyvol Basketball 50 Fri Mar 02, 2007 04:55pm
Texas Game SamFanboy Basketball 12 Mon Mar 29, 2004 09:49am
MSU vs. Texas game Zebra1 Basketball 4 Mon Mar 31, 2003 03:20pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1