Illegally batted ball?

[yawetag]

Five examples over several decades. In that time, what percentage of these calls do you think were made?

[Rich]

Notice nobody, NOBODY arguing for such a call to be made.

With the benefit of replay, I can see that his foot is probably 2 inches out of the box (only his heel has to be touching the line) at the time of contact. You expect an umpire to get that in real time? Especially since you have to see the foot at the time of contact, not a second later (since if the foot's in the air at contact, it's a legal play).

I choose to take my direction in this type play from the ML umpires who, wisely, IMO, don't bother with this kind of nonsense.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Especially since you have to see the foot at the time of contact, not a second later (since if the foot's in the air at contact, it's a legal play).

Not just the potential for the foot being in the air at the moment of contact - with a lunge like this, I GUARANTEE his foot is sliding forward - if you look down AFTER the contact, his foot is not where it was when he made contact.

Nevermind that in this particular play, with the foot significantly behind the plate, it's highly likely the umpire was blocked by the catcher at the moment of contact.

[MikeStrybel]

Agreed, Mike. Can you think of any other rules that we are expected to call but are so difficult to see that they are largely ignored?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by MikeStrybel

Agreed, Mike. Can you think of any other rules that we are expected to call but are so difficult to see that they are largely ignored?

Depending on the MLB umpire, the rule that the pitch must cross the plate to be called a strike is too difficult to see and largely ignored.

[Simply The Best]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Notice nobody, NOBODY arguing for such a call to be made.

You mean no one who apparently is not in your killfile.

With the benefit of replay, I can see that his foot is probably 2 inches out of the box (only his heel has to be touching the line) at the time of contact. You expect an umpire to get that in real time?

Absolutely.

I choose to take my direction in this type play from the ML umpires who, wisely, IMO, don't bother with this kind of nonsense.

What other OBR's do you ignore?

[Rich]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

Oooh, the mating call of the LL umpire.

You don't need to go there. I know plenty of HS-only umpires who are probably as terrible as the guys I've killfiled here. BTW, quoting these jokers makes me read their drivel if I keep following the thread.

I'm working one of the World Series put on by LL this year and I can assure you that many of us carry common sense and a sense of baseball tradition onto the field. Many of us are also HS and college umpires in the spring and work LL to give back to our communities in a way we enjoy.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

You don't need to go there. I know plenty of HS-only umpires who are probably as terrible as the guys I've killfiled here. BTW, quoting these jokers makes me read their drivel if I keep following the thread.

I'm working one of the World Series put on by LL this year and I can assure you that many of us carry common sense and a sense of baseball tradition onto the field. Many of us are also HS and college umpires in the spring and work LL to give back to our communities in a way we enjoy.

As you know, Rich, many of us distinguish between LL umpires and umpires who work LL.

[MikeStrybel]

Originally Posted by yawetag

Five examples over several decades. In that time, what percentage of these calls do you think were made?

That wasn't the question. 6.06a is still taught at pro school.

As noted, Evans and Wendlestedt both teach their students to see the ball contact the bat and then redirect to the batter's foot. That is a standard mechanic and is requires an umpire to know where the batter's feet are when contact is made.

In response to your question, I can think of numerous calls that aren't made regularly but that doesn't dismiss the fact that they are taught to look for them. Further, I cited a few that were noteworthy but there are others. When told that MLB doesn't call them, I merely provided a few times when they did. Obviously these umpires were taught the mechanic and remember how to do it. Knowing how to apply basic mechanics to help in uncommon situations is in play here. The rule book doesn't define every word and PBUC doesn't display every mechanic.

[MrUmpire]

Originally Posted by MikeStrybel

That wasn't the question. 6.06a is still taught at pro school.

As noted, Evans and Wendlestedt both teach their students to see the ball contact the bat and then redirect to the batter's foot. That is a standard mechanic and is requires an umpire to know where the batter's feet are when contact is made.

You truly see no difference in tracking a batted ball to the foot and tracking the ball away from a batter, into fair terriotry and still taking time to look for a foot? Neither school teaches that. Neither.

Wow.

[Chris Viverito]

JEAPU does teach umpires to call out of the box. If memory and my notes serve me well, this is something to resist over-officiating.

In other words - call it only when it is so clear the base umpires will see it...or if a player is known for it and...does it as in part one.