The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 08:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Illegally batted ball?

__________________
Cheers,
mb
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 09:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
Maybe. A little hard for me to tell from the video. And the guy that was standing three feet behind the plate who has responsibility for this call probably had an even worse view!

Watching the pitch would take your eyes away from the spot the foot was touching and the batter is probably blocking your view anyway.

I just thought it was cool that a team won a game 1-0 on a suicide squeeze, cooler yet than it was the Tribe and even cooler that they swept Boston. I couldn't watch the game yesterday, so was watching the STO replay this morning while getting ready for work. Had to stop brushing my teeth and walk to the living room when Cabrerra came to bat!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 09:55am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
The last angle was the best angle to see this. It looks pretty obvious that he was out of the box, but the PU would not be able to see that very well based on his angle and the catcher blocking the view.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 10:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Illegally batted ball?

Apparently not. I checked the box score.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Very rarely called (or expected to be called) in MLB.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 10:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by BretMan View Post
I just thought it was cool that a team won a game 1-0 on a suicide squeeze, cooler yet than it was the Tribe and even cooler that they swept Boston.
Not to mention the horrible base running by Boston to end the game.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 11:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
Illegally batted ball?

Apparently not. I checked the box score.
Prescriptivist.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 12:10pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 244
Man, PU blew the snot out of this call. He has a clear view of B's foot out of the box but he's looking up the line. The mechanic here is simple, once B has made contact, a quick glance down (don't have to dip your head) to check feet and the right call is made.

Pitiful.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 02:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply The Best View Post
Man, PU blew the snot out of this call. He has a clear view of B's foot out of the box but he's looking up the line. The mechanic here is simple, once B has made contact, a quick glance down (don't have to dip your head) to check feet and the right call is made.

Pitiful.
You have to be out of your f@*#ing mind to call that an illegally batted ball.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 02:22pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
You have to be out of your f@*#ing mind to call that an illegally batted ball.
Exactly. The inside line of the box is obliterated -- the PU is supposed to be able to tell if the back of the heel is out of the box or not based on that quick look?

Quick glance down? Prove that the foot was ON THE GROUND and completely out of the box at the INSTANT contact with the ball was made. You simply can't do that.

If you go looking for this crap, you're failing at your #1 job -- tracking the pitch.
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 02:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The worlds of H.S., JUCCO, D3 - D1 baseball.
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Exactly. The inside line of the box is obliterated -- the PU is supposed to be able to tell if the back of the heel is out of the box or not based on that quick look?

Quick glance down? Prove that the foot was ON THE GROUND and completely out of the box at the INSTANT contact with the ball was made. You simply can't do that.

If you go looking for this crap, you're failing at your #1 job -- tracking the pitch.
C'mon. Umpires are perfect. How can you possibly say this?
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 02:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
1) IMO probably a play on. Unless you clearly see his foot COMPLETELY outside the box....play on!

2) Would it be at all appropriate for a field umpire to help out on this call since he has a better view that PU?
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 02:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
2) Would it be at all appropriate for a field umpire to help out on this call since he has a better view that PU?
No.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 02:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Exactly. The inside line of the box is obliterated -- the PU is supposed to be able to tell if the back of the heel is out of the box or not based on that quick look?

Quick glance down? Prove that the foot was ON THE GROUND and completely out of the box at the INSTANT contact with the ball was made. You simply can't do that.

If you go looking for this crap, you're failing at your #1 job -- tracking the pitch.
I understand why the ump may have missed the call (for all the reasons previously stated); but the line is not "obliterated". You can plainly see it in the different camera angles and the batter's heel (and his entire foot) is clearly outside the box when he makes contact with the ball. By rule it should have been called an out.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 08, 2011, 03:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by richmsn View Post
if you go looking for this crap, you're failing at your #1 job -- tracking the pitch.
+1
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Catcher's Int on Illegally Batted ball eagle_12 Baseball 21 Sun Apr 25, 2010 07:23pm
Illegally Batted Ball? Zepp Softball 4 Tue May 15, 2007 10:29am
Illegally batted ball... am I the only one... Leecedar Baseball 36 Fri Nov 03, 2006 06:38pm
Illegally batted ball akalsey Baseball 11 Wed May 04, 2005 02:59pm
batted ball briank0627 Baseball 1 Mon Nov 08, 2004 09:29am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1