 
			
				Wed Oct 20, 2010, 04:00pm
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
				
				 Official Forum Member 
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
					Join Date: Jul 2004 
					Location: NE Ohio 
					
					
						Posts: 7,620
					 
					
					
					
					
					     
				 
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
	
	
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  dash_riprock
					 
				 
				I agree this is the way it should be called, but it is not the way the interp. is written. 
 
For this rule, MLB defines intent (applicable to both offensive and defensive INT): 
 
  "If, however, such person kicks the ball or picks it up or pushes it, that is considered intentional interference regardless of such person's actual intent." 
 
When the offensive player picks up the ball, he has, by definition, intentionally interfered. 
 
Just a bad choice of words.  I'm not going to lose sleep over it. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 I imagine that the rule is written this way to put a burden on people on the field to figure out the status of a ball they encounter. Look around to see if a fielder is running at you; holler, "is this ball in play?"; something, before you pick the damn thing up.
 
Not a bad idea, IMO.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Cheers, 
mb
			 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |