Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Thanks for the quote. I don't normally carry my baseball references around during the off-season.
The highlighted part is, I think, key.
And, in RefMag's play, S1 picked the ball up thinking it was foul, not with the intent to hinder play,
|
I agree this is the way it should be called, but it is not the way the interp. is written.
For this rule, MLB defines intent (applicable to both offensive and defensive INT):
"If, however, such person kicks the ball or picks it up or pushes it, that is considered intentional interference regardless of such person's actual intent."
When the offensive player picks up the ball, he has, by definition, intentionally interfered.
Just a bad choice of words. I'm not going to lose sleep over it.