The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 20, 2010, 04:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
I agree this is the way it should be called, but it is not the way the interp. is written.

For this rule, MLB defines intent (applicable to both offensive and defensive INT):

"If, however, such person kicks the ball or picks it up or pushes it, that is considered intentional interference regardless of such person's actual intent."

When the offensive player picks up the ball, he has, by definition, intentionally interfered.

Just a bad choice of words. I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
I imagine that the rule is written this way to put a burden on people on the field to figure out the status of a ball they encounter. Look around to see if a fielder is running at you; holler, "is this ball in play?"; something, before you pick the damn thing up.

Not a bad idea, IMO.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 20, 2010, 07:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Wouldn't we first be concerned if the bull pen is in play or out of play? Some fields have ground rules that put the on-field bull pen out of bounds or did we forget that little item (ground rules).
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 20, 2010, 09:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Wouldn't we first be concerned if the bull pen is in play or out of play? Some fields have ground rules that put the on-field bull pen out of bounds or did we forget that little item (ground rules).
I think the discussion presumes the bull pen is in live ball territory. Otherwise, it would be a very short discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 20, 2010, 09:25pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
I think the discussion presumes the bull pen is in live ball territory. Otherwise, it would be a very short discussion.
You're right. Why on earth would you have interference if the ball is already dead?
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 21, 2010, 07:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
Wouldn't we first be concerned if the bull pen is in play or out of play? Some fields have ground rules that put the on-field bull pen out of bounds or did we forget that little item (ground rules).
The OP specifically says "on the field of play" (and, that might be my typo -- the RefMag play *might* have been "in the field of play").

in any event, if it was "oob" it wouldn't be "on / in the field of play."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ball back to Pitcher Dukat Softball 9 Wed May 02, 2007 04:04pm
Quirky fields voiceoflg Baseball 12 Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:15am
Does The Pitcher Have to Show The Ball???? fastballb Softball 19 Sat Jul 31, 2004 12:08pm
turf fields chris s Football 7 Fri Jul 18, 2003 08:13am
Warming up in Bullpen Lilblue612 Baseball 3 Mon Jul 15, 2002 12:08pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1