No thread about Bob Davidson ejecting a fan?

[asdf]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

1. Bold part is most important.
2. Talk about being "damned with faint praise."
3. Precedent only means it has happened before, not that it was correct.
3. Davidson has already been "talked to."
4. He won't do it again.

Precedent was the cause for the protocol to be established....

He then followed established protcol....

It it happens again, he'll do it again. Exactly the same way.

[LeeBallanfant]

Originally Posted by asdf

Precedent was the cause for the protocol to be established....

He then followed established protcol....

It it happens again, he'll do it again. Exactly the same way.

A number of years ago I was at the Olympic Stadium and Mark Hirschbeck ejected a fan for unknown reasons. Since the Mets were in town, I would assume it was a Mets fan as I do not believe Hirschbeck understood French.

[MrUmpire]

Originally Posted by asdf

Precedent was the cause for the protocol to be established....

He then followed established protcol....

It it happens again, he'll do it again. Exactly the same way.

1. The precedent cited by MLB did not set or even utilize the same protocol, thus, you are incorrect. Protocol was previously established by policy. Davidson followed part of it.

2. He may do it again, there no telling with Davidson, however it was strongly suggested that he not.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

1. The precedent cited by MLB did not set or even utilize the same protocol, thus, you are incorrect. Protocol was previously established by policy. Davidson followed part of it.

2. He may do it again, there no telling with Davidson, however it was strongly suggested that he not.

By whom? Do you have a link?