Inattentive Runner - Collision - The Official Forum

#11 (permalink)

Sat Jun 19, 2010, 07:49pm

mbyron

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Jul 2004

Location: NE Ohio

Posts: 7,620

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives

Semantics?

"It cannot be assumed . . " is true in OBR. Assumption has nothing to do with it. You must judge willful & deliberate intent to call a DP. Judging the oblivious runner as having intent would be a MAJOR stretch.

In FED you CAN assume a DP eould have happened and call it.

No. Assumptions play no role in umpiring this play.

The rest of your post is correct.

__________________
Cheers,
mb

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Collision with the Coach	RANCHMAN	Basketball	15	Fri Jan 09, 2009 01:05pm
Result of Collision at First	dnorthen	Baseball	11	Sun Apr 27, 2008 08:08am
2 Collision Questions	bossman72	Baseball	14	Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:58am
F2/R1 collision or is it obs?	chas	Softball	4	Thu Mar 24, 2005 09:08am
Collision at first	SF	Softball	2	Sun Oct 03, 2004 07:55pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53am.