The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 19, 2010, 07:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
Semantics?

"It cannot be assumed . . " is true in OBR. Assumption has nothing to do with it. You must judge willful & deliberate intent to call a DP. Judging the oblivious runner as having intent would be a MAJOR stretch.

In FED you CAN assume a DP eould have happened and call it.
No. Assumptions play no role in umpiring this play.

The rest of your post is correct.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Collision with the Coach RANCHMAN Basketball 15 Fri Jan 09, 2009 01:05pm
Result of Collision at First dnorthen Baseball 11 Sun Apr 27, 2008 08:08am
2 Collision Questions bossman72 Baseball 14 Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:58am
F2/R1 collision or is it obs? chas Softball 4 Thu Mar 24, 2005 09:08am
Collision at first SF Softball 2 Sun Oct 03, 2004 07:55pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1