The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 02:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Multiple Obstructions

This came up a few years ago and was originally a softball play, and I posted it then - generating some lively discussion. It came up again while sitting under the Umpire Tree last week, so I thought I'd see if it generates any new thoughts this time around, and if the conclusion is different for either OBR or FED than it is in ASA or other softball codes...

No one on base, B hits the ball between the outfielders. As he's rounding first, F3 is standing on the bag. BU rules and signals obstruction, mentally noting that this runner would have gotten to third base without the obstruction.

B rounding 2nd, and the throw, heading from CF to a deep SS, is dropped by the SS. While rounding 2nd, he collides with an inattentive F4 watching the play. BU resignals the obstruction, and based on where the ball is and where the runner is, again decides that based on this OBS alone, he should get 3rd.

Runner slides safely into third base.

PU and BU discuss, and both had the same awards - but both feel that had NEITHER obstruction occured, AND the misplay at F6 happened as it did, this runner likely would have scored.

What do you do?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 02:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

mbcrowder,

Score the runner.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 02:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
mbcrowder,

Score the runner.

JM
Which ruleset, and by what rule (and if necessary, logic)
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 03:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Which ruleset, and by what rule (and if necessary, logic)
Any rule set. The logic is to award base(s) so as to nullify the act of obstruction. If the ump thought the runner would have scored absent the obstruction(s), then score him.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 03:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
Any rule set. The logic is to award base(s) so as to nullify the act of obstruction. If the ump thought the runner would have scored absent the obstruction(s), then score him.
Logically, I agree.

However (depending on the rule set), the rule says to determine immediately upon the incident of obstruction what base to protect to - and award that base. How do we support, using the rules as printed, the award of home. (Yes, I know ... we can simply say we thought she'd score on either of the OBS's, but that avoids my point).
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 03:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Which ruleset, and by what rule (and if necessary, logic)
What dash said.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 03:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

mbcrowder,

The initial determination of protection on an obstruction call where the ball remains in play is provisional; "post obstruction evidence" (i.e., what happens AFTER the obstruction occurs) should be considered in determining the actual final award(s).

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 03:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) View Post
mbcrowder,

The initial determination of protection on an obstruction call where the ball remains in play is provisional; "post obstruction evidence" (i.e., what happens AFTER the obstruction occurs) should be considered in determining the actual final award(s).

JM
1+

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 03:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Logically, I agree.

However (depending on the rule set), the rule says to determine immediately upon the incident of obstruction what base to protect to - and award that base. How do we support, using the rules as printed, the award of home. (Yes, I know ... we can simply say we thought she'd score on either of the OBS's, but that avoids my point).
The MLBUM says in section 6.20 & 6.21 that, with type b obstruction, that you make an initial assessment but allow play to continue until its conclusion and THEN make the final decision as to where the protection was. They have example plays where the protected-to base changed as the play developed and concluded.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 08:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
How about this, which happened last night: B1 grounds to F6, who throws high to F3. The ball is over F3's head and to the HP side of the base; he lands right in front of the runner, who collides with him. The ball ricocheted off the lip of the dugout steps (in play) and back into the infield.

What's the call? Assume NFHS rules (would OBR be different?).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 10, 2010, 08:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
How about this, which happened last night: B1 grounds to F6, who throws high to F3. The ball is over F3's head and to the HP side of the base; he lands right in front of the runner, who collides with him. The ball ricocheted off the lip of the dugout steps (in play) and back into the infield.

What's the call? Assume NFHS rules (would OBR be different?).
I assume by "ricochet and back into the infield" you mean BR would have ended up at first without any obstruction.

That's the award in both FED and OBR -- the OBS was prior to first, so the minimum award is first.

On the OP, I agree with the "award home" answers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiple Obstructions MD Longhorn Softball 25 Sat Jun 12, 2010 08:17am
Multiple Foul ? MajorCord Basketball 22 Fri May 29, 2009 08:36pm
Multiple forums??? DownTownTonyBrown General / Off-Topic 10 Sat Aug 28, 2004 08:24pm
Multiple T's BoomerSooner Basketball 6 Fri Feb 27, 2004 01:53am
Multiple fouls bseybs32 Basketball 3 Mon Feb 09, 2004 11:27am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1