Multiple Obstructions

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by dash_riprock

Any rule set. The logic is to award base(s) so as to nullify the act of obstruction. If the ump thought the runner would have scored absent the obstruction(s), then score him.

Logically, I agree.

However (depending on the rule set), the rule says to determine immediately upon the incident of obstruction what base to protect to - and award that base. How do we support, using the rules as printed, the award of home. (Yes, I know ... we can simply say we thought she'd score on either of the OBS's, but that avoids my point).