![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
You said:
or where the umpire believes he would have reached absent the obstruction. and the use of "or" means you pick one of the options and ignore the other - thus you could throw out the "minimum one base" part and pick the "base he would have reached" part so on a pickoff attempt at first, given those words, one could think you award first.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong Last edited by Rich Ives; Wed May 05, 2010 at 10:14am. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Sorry coach. I'll be much more careful of my sentence construction in the future. I shan't confuse you again. |
|
|||
|
I'm not the one who was confused. Verily thou shouldst try to keep it straight.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
|
For the record, I wasn't confused either. My point was that the "or" changes the way the rule can be applied.
|
|
|||
|
Proper mechanic for obstruction by F3 on R1 on a pickoff:
"Time. That's Obstruction. You (point at R1)...2nd base (point at 2nd base)."
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Malicious Contact? | Spence | Baseball | 17 | Wed Jun 10, 2009 07:32am |
| Malicious contact? | SouthGARef | Baseball | 24 | Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:26am |
| Almost Malicious contact ? | Chess Ref | Softball | 26 | Mon Mar 12, 2007 02:09pm |
| Malicious Contact | Gre144 | Baseball | 1 | Wed Jul 04, 2001 11:42am |
| Malicious Contact (FED) | Gre144 | Baseball | 1 | Tue Jun 26, 2001 09:12am |