View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 05, 2010, 07:08am
yawetag yawetag is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrUmpire View Post
Your understanding is incorrect. He is awarded a minimum of one base from the last he legally held at the time of obstruction, or where the umpire believes he would have reached absent the obstruction. If he was obstructed attempting to reach third, the minimum award would be from second.
Your wording is a bit confusing. I prefer: "He is awarded the base where the umpire believes he would have reached absent the obstruction. However, he must be awarded a minimum of one base from the base legally occupied at the time of obstruction"

Your wording allows an umpire to keep R1 at 1B when F3 obstructs him on a pick-off.
Reply With Quote