The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2010, 07:50pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
Walk-off Walk Situation

All codes. Bases loaded, bottom of the last inning, TWO OUT, tie score. Batter gets a base on balls. He touches first, the runner from third touches home, but the runner who was on first peeled off to join the celebration without touching second. The defense appealed that the runner did not advance to second and instead abandoned his efforts to run the bases.

Does the run count?

Please cite rules and any other applicable comments (J/R, for example).

JJ

Last edited by JJ; Fri Mar 26, 2010 at 10:57pm. Reason: clarified number of outs!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2010, 08:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

JJ,

OBR, the run scores. 4.09(b)

FED, the run does not.

NCAA...Damn, I can't remember!

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2010, 08:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post
All codes. Bases loaded, bottom of the last inning, tie score. Batter gets a base on balls. He touches first, the runner from third touches home, but the runner who was on first peeled off to join the celebration without touching second. The defense appealed that the runner did not advance to second and instead abandoned his efforts to run the bases.

Does the run count?

Please cite rules and any other applicable comments (J/R, for example).

JJ
How many out?

If it wasn't the third out the run always scores.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2010, 08:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Red face

I concur with Rich.

Shame on me, I was "assuming" two outs.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2010, 10:52pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
Oops, my bad....two out. Potential game ender....

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 27, 2010, 08:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 77
Ncaa

I'm told that this was addressed at the Philadelphia meeting. It is no longer an appeal play. We are to rule R1 out only if he abandons the baseline prior to the run scoring.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 27, 2010, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
Gerry is correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GerryB View Post
I'm told that this was addressed at the Philadelphia meeting. It is no longer an appeal play. We are to rule R1 out only if he abandons the baseline prior to the run scoring.
I also heard that in Philly.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 27, 2010, 10:10pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by GerryB View Post
I'm told that this was addressed at the Philadelphia meeting. It is no longer an appeal play. We are to rule R1 out only if he abandons the baseline prior to the run scoring.
I was at the Dallas meeting and this was not extensively addressed. "It is no longer an appeal play" was never mentioned. That's why I posted the question. I'm hoping we see an AR either online or in next year's rule book.

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 28, 2010, 08:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post
I was at the Dallas meeting and this was not extensively addressed. "It is no longer an appeal play" was never mentioned. That's why I posted the question. I'm hoping we see an AR either online or in next year's rule book.

JJ
I seem to recall an OBR interp (MLBUM or PBUS) where "abandonment" was a timing play, not a force play. And, since it usually happens after R3 crosses the plate, then the run counts and there's no need to get the out.

Of course, the defense can still appeal the missed base, and that might change the ruling.

(another possibility, of course, is that I'm mis-remembering this.)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 28, 2010, 09:15am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
I seem to recall an OBR interp (MLBUM or PBUS) where "abandonment" was a timing play, not a force play. And, since it usually happens after R3 crosses the plate, then the run counts and there's no need to get the out.

Of course, the defense can still appeal the missed base, and that might change the ruling.

(another possibility, of course, is that I'm mis-remembering this.)
In OBR, only the BR and U3 need to advance. I'll look it up later if I have to. FED it's just the opposite, all have to advance. Apparently there's been a change in NCAA and since I packed that in 2 years ago....
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 28, 2010, 12:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
In OBR, only the BR and U3 need to advance. I'll look it up later if I have to. FED it's just the opposite, all have to advance. Apparently there's been a change in NCAA and since I packed that in 2 years ago....
R3? I don't see how U3's advancement has anything to do with this. Other than I he calls it correctly he may move up in ranking.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 28, 2010, 01:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
In OBR, only the BR and U3 need to advance. I'll look it up later if I have to. FED it's just the opposite, all have to advance. Apparently there's been a change in NCAA and since I packed that in 2 years ago....
Yes, if it's a walk.

I was on the similar play where it's a "hit" when I answered.

My miistake
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 28, 2010, 07:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Yup Bob, hit is a different scenario for sure. Merkle's boner!

Okay, I'll link what I'm talking about so you all don't get any ideas. Merkle's Boner - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And to take it one step further, any base award that may end the game, the same situation applies. Just a runner touching home and a batter touching first will do. Unless its off a batted ball with a force play.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Walk this way ? Chess Ref Softball 20 Mon Mar 29, 2010 09:51pm
Walk? bigzilla Basketball 15 Thu Feb 03, 2005 10:48am
walk-out b_ref15 Basketball 2 Sun Oct 17, 2004 09:17pm
walk or not? jr Basketball 19 Fri Oct 15, 2004 06:56am
Here's another walk/no walk decision..... Jeremy Hohn Basketball 3 Mon Dec 09, 2002 10:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1