The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 10, 2010, 06:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
I got a great deal from someone on this forum last year for a low-profile Titanium and I absolutely love it.

Question: Is the "steel" mask that is advertised on Epic's website the black cage version of the Titanium? I vaguely remember Between the Lines carrying what they called a Titanium a while back but it was a black cage instead of the silver like normal. Anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 10, 2010, 06:58pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fittske View Post
Yes I love it. I have taken a hand full of shots directly to the mask from LL 12yr olds, to High school Varsity to D1-D2 College pitchers and the mask simply spins off and falls to the ground. After the impact, I usually brush it off, inspect for a quick dent, put it back on.... and put the ball back in play.
I had one, sold it at a tournament in Europe last summer for €100. Weird little quirk I have -- I like using the same hat on the plate that I do on the bases and it was just impossible with the low profile.

So I got a standard profile one. I'll be stylin' and profilin' with my new mask and my new Riddell Power this spring.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 11, 2010, 09:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
You like the low profile mask? Really?
I have both. I started with the low-profile, because that was the first one available. I got the standard when I had to swap the first one out after it bent.

I now use the standard almost all the time. I use the low-profile when the stuff the kids are throwing isn't over 80 m.p.h.

In a winter scrimmage, I took a straight, uncaught 94 m.p.h. fastball straight in the right eye area of the standard one (a half swing blinded the catcher). The mask landed 15 feet behind and to the right of me.

I can say that the light weight makes for less of a jolt, and the pads on that mask are the best imaginable. Wear it loose, like Tim C. professes---it makes all the difference in the world. That same shot with a heavier mask that stays on, and it's a much different jolt.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 15, 2010, 03:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 371
I just called there. They said they only carry the low profile
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 15, 2010, 06:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
It's your face and head. Paying what you need to pay to protect it optimally is, pardon the pun, a no-brainer.

Save (conceal) an extra game fee or two, and pay the difference to Jim at Ump-attire.com, and get what you need and truly want.

It's worth it in two ways: you get a titanium and you don't have to deal with Epic Sports.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 16, 2010, 12:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25 View Post
Yes, absolutely.
I found that interesting too. Word on the street, and from a couple of umpire unions, is that low-prof masks carry a substantially higher risk for incurring a concussion.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 16, 2010, 01:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Has anyone ever actually confirmed this with real evidence and not anecdotal stories?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 16, 2010, 02:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Has anyone ever actually confirmed this with real evidence and not anecdotal stories?

I doubt there's an emperical evidence out there. It's just based on physics and common sense. I'd rather have a hatchet shape in front of me to deflect the energy, than a flat shape to absorbe it.

I don't know about "substantially higher", but logic would tell you the more round the shape, the less of a "flat" blow you'll get. What you're trying to avoid is the straight shot, where the ball just falls right in front of you. I had one of those with the old +POS SUL. I took the whole brunt of that one. I was coo-coo for three days, and didn't even know it.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 18, 2010, 02:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
I took a straight, uncaught 94 m.p.h. fastball....
I don't care what kind of "profile" mask you are wearing....when a 94 m.p.h. hits you uncaught, it's going to stun you for a sec. Like Finnerty says... gotta keep that mask loose.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 22, 2010, 09:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25 View Post
Has anyone ever actually confirmed this with real evidence and not anecdotal stories?
Other than PBUC umpires telling me 'low-profile' masks were deemed 'not recommended' for safety from an increased potential for concussion...I have no real evidence.

As for choosing between standard or low-profile - I've used both and don't see a benefit from the low-pro significant enough for taking a risk for lack of real evidence. Of course others might prefer the field of view offered by the low-pro and choose to take that risk.

It's another purely subjective decision. No matter which mask is chosen we are at risk of being concussed when struck. Occupational hazard.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 22, 2010, 08:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Well, some coaches would argue that the low profile hasn't helped me to see the zone any better.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 23, 2010, 08:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 371
ok, finally pulled the trigger yesterday. I ordered the Standard profile from Ump Attire. Sorry, but I like the 2 tone pads.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 23, 2010, 08:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR12 View Post
ok, finally pulled the trigger yesterday. I ordered the Standard profile from Ump Attire. Sorry, but I like the 2 tone pads.
You should never have to apologize for liking something that's two-tone.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 23, 2010, 09:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
You should never have to apologize for liking something that's two-tone.
+POS two-toned ball bags?

Maybe those are the exception that proves the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 23, 2010, 10:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
Sheesh!

I didn't think of that, Bob. Good save.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wilson titanium mask mbyron Baseball 72 Mon Oct 19, 2009 02:51pm
Wilson Titanium sun visor biggravy Baseball 5 Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:30pm
Wilson Titanium harness question biggravy Baseball 4 Mon Jul 13, 2009 05:04pm
Wilson Titanium mask pads for sale zm1283 Baseball 0 Fri Jul 10, 2009 02:57pm
Wilson Titanium mask Klokard Baseball 154 Wed May 13, 2009 05:55pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1