![]() |
|
|||
7-11-f Exception (4) is the classic "tangle/untangle" where the B/R is heading to 1st base and the catcher is pursuing a batted ball out in front of the plate (i.e., both players are doing what they are supposed to be doing). Unless there is an intentional act, like a shove, it's nothing.
In the NCAA question, the batter's unintentional bump "causes the catcher to drop the pop-up." You have to have INT on that. A bump that causes a momentary delay in his fielding of the ball is treated differently than contact that causes him to drop a fly ball. I know that is not exactly what the rule says, but that's the way I was taught to enforce it. On the balk question, NCAA is treating the balk call as judgment rather than a misapplication of a rule. In Appendix E, NCAA gives one example of a balk call that can be changed - when the calling umpire did not realize F1 had stepped off. My guess is, if that is not the specific reason for undoing the balk call, then the NCAA doesn't want it changed. I can see your problem with this one too. Here's one from the written test given by my NCAA chapter: A batter's legal position in the box is determined by: a) Both feet are entirely within (not touching) the lines of the batters box b) Both feet are entirely within the outer edge of the batters box lines c) The batter is no closer than 6" from the inner edge of the plate d) b & c How would you answer that one? |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test | ljudge | Football | 2 | Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am |
FED test questions | bossman72 | Baseball | 68 | Sun Mar 30, 2008 06:02pm |
Test Questions-NF | devdog69 | Volleyball | 19 | Wed Aug 24, 2005 01:07pm |
NCAA Test questions | jjrye22 | Football | 0 | Wed Jan 12, 2005 05:54am |
Questions from the test | devdog69 | Volleyball | 14 | Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07am |