![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
Now, I may change my mind a bit once I see the closeness of the play, but he is certainly getting 3rd on this play as described. If he tripped after 2nd, or stopped and yelled about the OBS before going to 3rd, or didn't run hard into 3rd, maybe we have an out. But the question doesn't describe any of that action, so, protect him to 3rd. |
|
|||
7-11-f Exception (4) is the classic "tangle/untangle" where the B/R is heading to 1st base and the catcher is pursuing a batted ball out in front of the plate (i.e., both players are doing what they are supposed to be doing). Unless there is an intentional act, like a shove, it's nothing.
In the NCAA question, the batter's unintentional bump "causes the catcher to drop the pop-up." You have to have INT on that. A bump that causes a momentary delay in his fielding of the ball is treated differently than contact that causes him to drop a fly ball. I know that is not exactly what the rule says, but that's the way I was taught to enforce it. On the balk question, NCAA is treating the balk call as judgment rather than a misapplication of a rule. In Appendix E, NCAA gives one example of a balk call that can be changed - when the calling umpire did not realize F1 had stepped off. My guess is, if that is not the specific reason for undoing the balk call, then the NCAA doesn't want it changed. I can see your problem with this one too. Here's one from the written test given by my NCAA chapter: A batter's legal position in the box is determined by: a) Both feet are entirely within (not touching) the lines of the batters box b) Both feet are entirely within the outer edge of the batters box lines c) The batter is no closer than 6" from the inner edge of the plate d) b & c How would you answer that one? |
|
|||
Quote:
If they're trying to be cute, b is the only correct answer because the batter could be 10 feet from the plate and satisfy c, but obviously not be legal... |
|
|||
Quote:
B and D are both correct, but one of them will be graded as incorrect (I'll find out which in about a week). It just ain't fair. |
|
|||
2 additional Q's
John -
I hope it's ok to piggy-back on your topic - I would appreciate some collective wisdom on the following one that I missed: R1, the batter bunts down the first base line. The ball has rolled into foul territory but hits a clump of dirt in the running lane and changes direction and rolls back into fair territory. The BR inadvertently kicks it. a. BR is out only if the ball is fair when he kicks it. b. BR is out. c. Foul ball. d. R1 is out. Explanation 7-11-o I put a, answer is b Here is 7-11-o: The batter is out when: o. After hitting or bunting a foul ball, the batter-runner intentionally deflects the course of the ball in any manner while running to first base; or intentionally interferes with the catcher’s attempt to field a third strike. The ball is dead and no runner may advance; BTW - I missed your 2nd Q as well...they've spent so much time on the "getting the call right" mentality that even tho this isn't one of the 7 scenarios listed in Appendix E, I thought they were trying to give us other examples where they prefer us to give unsolicited "help". Thanks - Bob |
|
|||
Quote:
you put a... but if you read the question, it said the ball rolled back into fair territory..so B would be the correct answer....
__________________
"My greatest fear is that when I die, my wife will sell my golf clubs for what I told her I paid for them." |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
As for the balk scenario...this isn't a legal do over. U3 has to eat his call. After reading it again, I didn't do the test, but reading all of the options, I would've put "A." This isn't one that you can really fix. The CCA manual says something about the fact that changing the call would cause more problems so they eat this one.
At least I think it was CCA...but it might have been the NCAA memorandum on Appendix E that was published after an NCAA conference.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again Last edited by johnnyg08; Tue Feb 23, 2010 at 11:22pm. Reason: wrong scenario |
|
|||
Two outta three ain't bad...unless the part you missed is the third one.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test | ljudge | Football | 2 | Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am |
FED test questions | bossman72 | Baseball | 68 | Sun Mar 30, 2008 06:02pm |
Test Questions-NF | devdog69 | Volleyball | 19 | Wed Aug 24, 2005 01:07pm |
NCAA Test questions | jjrye22 | Football | 0 | Wed Jan 12, 2005 05:54am |
Questions from the test | devdog69 | Volleyball | 14 | Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07am |