The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 27, 2009, 07:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
Three Man Position Question

During last night's Blue Jays-Rays game, the umpire crew went down to a three man rotation (twice). I have a question with regarding their positioning with a runner on first. Being Canadian our manual calls for U3 to move inside and U1 to stay on the right field foul line, yet the crew last night had U1 moving inside and U3 stayed on the left field foul line.

Does anyone know if the crew did this last night because PU had been injured in the game and was moved to U3 and they decided to modify the rotation or is this how their 3 man rotation is suppose to work?

Last edited by tibear; Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 07:56am.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 27, 2009, 07:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by tibear View Post
During last night's Blue Jays-Rays game, the umpire crew went down to a three man rotation (twice). I have a question with regarding their positioning with a runner on first. Being Canadian our manual calls for U3 to move inside and U1 to stay on the right field foul line, yet the crew last night had U1 moving inside and U3 stayed on the left field foul line.

Does anyone know if the crew did this last night because PU had been injured in the game and was moved to U3 and they decided to modify the rotation or is this how their 3 man rotation is suppose to work?
U1 is supposed to be at first when there's an R1.

An exception might be with R1 and R2 and an "obvious" bunt situation.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 27, 2009, 08:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Might have been an adjustment to minimize the risk of Hallion getting dinged again. Frankly, if they're going to do that they'd be better off going to 2-man.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 27, 2009, 09:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
The Angels-Tigers went to three-man the other night, too. It's pretty interesting seeing those guys reach back and pull that off with no notice.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 27, 2009, 09:56am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
They changed from Polo Blue to Black after Hallion went down. Maybe they were trying to change their luck to ward off the baseball.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 27, 2009, 10:07am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve View Post
They changed from Polo Blue to Black after Hallion went down. Maybe they were trying to change their luck to ward off the baseball.
The base guys were wearing the smocks, I think. So it was just the plate guy putting on whatever shirt he felt like wearing.

Our chest protectors aren't as long as catchers', and I *do* give the announcer credit for knowing that and being able to relate that to people watching.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 27, 2009, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
In the Angels-Tigers game, Tim Welke took a jaw shot and had to leave with his second concussion in a month. And it wasn't any jaw shot: It was a 99 m.p.h. Justin Verlander fastball that was ticked by a 115 m.p.h. Vladi Guerrero swing. I don't think a foul can get any worse than that.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 28, 2009, 04:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Our chest protectors aren't as long as catchers', and I *do* give the announcer credit for knowing that and being able to relate that to people watching.
They are, but I can't see his being THAT short. It hit him around the ribs. Every protector I've seen covers at least that much.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 28, 2009, 07:04pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by yawetag View Post
They are, but I can't see his being THAT short. It hit him around the ribs. Every protector I've seen covers at least that much.
The West Vest Platinum, even in the biggest size available, leaves the lower ribs exposed on larger people. This protector seems to have been designed for little fellahs.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free Throw Position question Terrapins Fan Basketball 13 Wed Feb 18, 2009 03:36pm
Mechanics - Position A - 3 man - Question SAWolf Baseball 2 Thu May 15, 2008 10:09am
Windup position - position of pivot foot BigGuy Baseball 3 Thu May 31, 2007 02:21am
3 man lock down position question stewcall Basketball 13 Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:40pm
Once more, the question of a legal guarding position Damian Basketball 10 Mon Sep 29, 2003 10:53am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1