The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 07:19am
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,047
Video posted on the NFHS Discussion Forum.

This video was posted in the NFHS Baseball Discussion Forum.

YouTube - Baseball fight!


Let the discussion begin.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 07:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Double forfeit.

If the state won't enforce that, then MC on the catcher.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 07:30am
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Double forfeit.

If the state won't enforce that, then MC on the catcher.

Bob:

I agree with you. In fact it was pretty close to MC by both F2 and the Runner with Runner on the losing end of the contact.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 07:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 251
AAh, good old fashion baseball... Thanks for bringing back the memories of youth...

But Bob's right, double forfeit. The good old days are over.....

It does appear that the runner instigated it, but then the catcher continued it by hovering over his kill. Had no fight occurred, I got both of them ejected. The runner for M/C and then the catcher for his unsportsmanlike conduct. I dont consider a glove sammich (spelled that way on purpose) M/C when the catcher is put in this situation....
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 08:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 194
I've got an immediate ejection on the runner for MC. Ejection on the catcher for his response to the MC.

I thought the umpires did a fine job of restoring order, with the help of a deputy. But I don't see how they allowed this game to continue.

3-3-Q... A coach, player substitute, attendant or other bench personnel shall not leave their positions or bench area for the purpose of fighting or physical confrontation.
PENALTY... The umpire shall eject the offender from the game. (A coach who attempts to prevent a fight or restore order is not in violation of the rule).

If I'm in a game where both benches empty, I don't foresee allowing it to continue.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 08:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,230
Agree with Bob. No way would I be sticking around for a sequel

-Josh
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 08:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
It would be easier to look in both dugouts to see who (if anyone) is NOT participating in the fight. They are the only players who are not ejected.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 11:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Don't have my book in front of me and it seemed as though this was probably a playoff game (which should not matter), but what rule gives us the right to suspend the game because a fight occurs?

When the going gets tough gentlemen, do we get going?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 11:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 371
Are you kidding!!!! Every player that left the bench or their position on the field, even to advance toward the fight should be ejected.
If that was done, neither team would have enough to continue the game.
My take is GAME OVER!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 11:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

jicecone,

It's actually a combination of rules. 3-3-1q and 4-4-1f work for me.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 11:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
4-4-1 A game shall be forfeited to the offended team by the umpire when
a team:

f. is unable to provide at least nine players to start the game or cannot provide eight players to finish the game


If either team has less than 8 players after all ejections the game is over.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,118
If three kids from each team go in a fight, I do not think anyone would say anything other than ejections.

These umpires are out of their freaking minds to continue this game. I agree with all that have said double forfeit.

I do not agree with what was said above that the umpires did a fine job of restoring order. There is no order if these kids were allowed to continue playing.

Joe in Missouri
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 12:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwwashburn View Post
If three kids from each team go in a fight, I do not think anyone would say anything other than ejections.

These umpires are out of their freaking minds to continue this game. I agree with all that have said double forfeit.

I do not agree with what was said above that the umpires did a fine job of restoring order. There is no order if these kids were allowed to continue playing.

Joe in Missouri
I said I couldn't believe they let the game to continue.

As far as restoring order, I was simply talking about getting the fight stopped. As ugly as this was, it could have been worse if fans had gotten involved or kids had gotten hurt.

I think it's asinine that this game was allowed to continue. It doesn't matter if this was a playoff game or not, I would have stopped everything and let the state association decide what to do.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 01:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardinalfan View Post
I said I couldn't believe they let the game to continue.

As far as restoring order, I was simply talking about getting the fight stopped. As ugly as this was, it could have been worse if fans had gotten involved or kids had gotten hurt.

I think it's asinine that this game was allowed to continue. It doesn't matter if this was a playoff game or not, I would have stopped everything and let the state association decide what to do.
I don't agree. The umpires did a good job in an ugly situation, the coaches ended up getting order restored.

Baseball does not have the leaving the bench rule like basketball; however, I would have been writing down number of anyone who made contact with another player.

I would hope though that the state association would review, put both schools on probation and if a playoff situation, make certain that players ejected do not play the next game etc.,

For certain, F2 is ejected and runner is because of MC.

I've had a basketball brawl before and it's very ugly, but the game was able to continue without further incident.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 20, 2009, 01:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by David B View Post
Baseball does not have the leaving the bench rule like basketball;
3-3-1q and 3.3.1JJ (especially the part about "once F6 and the on-deck batter LEFT THEIR POSITIONS" (emphasis added) ) would seem to say that baseball does have such a rule.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS Discussion Board Link Blue37 Baseball 4 Mon Feb 25, 2008 03:22pm
NFHS New Rules are posted Grail Basketball 123 Fri May 18, 2007 09:43am
NFHS Part 1 discussion points Schmack42 Basketball 8 Mon Nov 14, 2005 05:26pm
2003-2004 NFHS Interps Are Posted bob jenkins Basketball 9 Mon Oct 20, 2003 01:44pm
NFHS Scrimmage-kick rule discussion ramaris Football 25 Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1