The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 11, 2009, 06:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Emerling View Post
I have a copy of the 2006 BRD and play 171-320 is not only a stark example of the interpretation of the rule - but, in my opinion, it goes a bit overboard.

Play 171-320: FED only. Bases loaded: B1 grounds to F4, who fields the ball and throws to F6 to start the double play. F6 catches the throw and forces out R1 as F6 crosses the bag to the right field side. F6 now throws to first as retired R1 begins his slide into second. Retired R1's slide is clearly to the right side of the bag (the side F6 is now on). R1 is sliding towards F6, but he misses the shortstop by a foot or two as F6 keeps moving after the throw. F6's throw is in time to retire BR at 1B; meanwhile, R3 scores. Ruling: Even though it is obvious the runner is illegally sliding toward the fielder, it is not interference. The ball remains alive: two out, R3 in, R2 on third.
One of the NFHS rules guys (I forget who) opined on this play several years ago on one of the internet forums and issued the opinion that "no contact = no interference."

Frankly, I think he's wrong.

If the slide is through the bag, then contact is needed. If the slide is toward the fielder, then contact is not needed. That's how I read 2-Slide-Illegal (whatever the section number is). The words "and makes contact" are in some of the specific rules, but not in the "fails to slide directly toward the bag" rule.

IT's been noted many, mnay times before, but FED hasn't changes the ruling.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
force play slide rule? ggk Baseball 41 Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:12pm
Force play slide + a balk Bob Lyle Baseball 6 Tue Oct 18, 2005 08:50pm
Force Play slide rule Bill Boos Baseball 11 Fri Mar 18, 2005 04:20pm
NCAA Force Play Slide Rule Randallump Baseball 6 Sat Apr 21, 2001 07:15pm
Force-slide play or just interference? Gre144 Baseball 1 Thu Mar 29, 2001 12:31am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1