![]() |
|
|
|||
Theory behind B and C positions
I was asked a question about positioning last weekend- "Why with R3 only are we in C position?" I didn't have a good answer and I mentioned something about 'playing the percentages.' He then came back with "Well, why don't we go to B when there's 2 outs since the percentages say that the play is going to be at first?" Once again, I had no answer.
So, I defer my answers for this guy to you guys ![]() |
|
|||
I'm only in B with runners on first, first and third, or bases loaded. Everything else is C with runners on. Personally, I don't have a problem making a call on a play at first when I start in C. Just gain some ground toward first and get a good angle and you're fine. I did notice tonight that if a ball is hit to F6 and he has to charge it, you had better be ready to move if you're in C if he is going to throw to first.
|
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Some prefer C, but like you stated, I like to be close to the play. But, I've worked with other groups who mandate move to C. Playing percentages, what is it, less than 5% of plays at 3rd, so why do we spend so much time worrying about 3rd?? Thanks David |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Why C?
I hate to be so old now, I remember "old school stuff"....
The old timers taught me that "being ahead of the runner" is the important thing, that is why many people are in C even with R3. You may say that you can't be ahead of the runner in C, but many times that run is the important runner in the game, and if there is a play on him at #B, it can be a significant play in the game. The concepts that are so important in teaching mechanics today, like "angle over distance" and "cover the money play" were not as emphasized as they are now. when I went to school in the 1980's neither of these concepts were even discussed. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Criticality of the play should dictate which position BU takes, the closer to HP the more critical the play.
R1, B you have both covered, PO and the steal. R2, C, PO and steal attempt. R3, C, PO attempt. R1, R2, C, PO at 2nd more critical than PO at 1B, steal of 3rd more critical than steal of 2nd. etc. etc. B with R3, or C with R1 is good for one thing, killing grass. The guys in Wi, if they think "making smaller sideways profiles is gonne keep em safer, rethink that. The human head is pretty much round, and the eyes are best used for tracking a moving object while "facing it".
__________________
SLAS |
|
|||
Well, as we can see here , when in Rome do as you like.
Actually depending on the level, usually depends on wether I am in B or C. Usually, in games where da boys shave you rarely see a pickoff at third. HS JV and below it becomes a pain in the butt sometimes but, you will have a closer view. I am always in B with R1 only. Just easier to sell on a close pick. |
|
|||
Quote:
It's not only the "percentages," it's the time to move, and the type of call. On a pick to third, the umpire will not have much time to move, already has an angle, and closer will be better for seeing (or at least selling) the tag play -- and most of these will be "close". On a grounder with a throw to first, the umpire has plenty of time to move, sometimes the play will not be close, and distance doesn't matter as much on a "force play" (sic). |
|
|||
I know I stand with 2 outs in "B"...Im sure I read that in the CCA or the Red Book.
you are also in "C" in cause of a pickoff.
__________________
"My greatest fear is that when I die, my wife will sell my golf clubs for what I told her I paid for them." |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can anyone explain the theory behind the superwide stance? | Dakota | Softball | 19 | Thu Jul 19, 2007 03:17pm |
Conspiracy Theory | mick | Basketball | 2 | Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:41pm |
Umpiring theory | CecilOne | Softball | 13 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 02:42pm |
Theory and Practice | Nevadaref | Basketball | 25 | Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:42pm |
Theory behind the muffed punt...? | EricSeattle | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:10pm |