runner int in game one

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by OzUmp

Not what one would call a quality throw, but should have been easily handled.

"Quality throw" is EXACTLY the expression they use in pro school to determine whether to call running lane interference. Without a "quality throw," you pass on the interference.

That said, the usual criterion of "quality" is "had a chance to retire the runner," and the throw on that play certainly did.

I would guess that if you asked the crew, they'd say that F3 misplayed the throw, and that it wasn't due to the runner being in fair territory. That's plausible (unless you're a fanboy).