View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 23, 2008, 08:40pm
Rich Ives Rich Ives is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickG View Post
It was a TERRIBLE call. The runner was not only fully outside the running lane, he even took a subtle zag (or was it a zig) toward the fielder approching the ball. The throw to first was clearly affected by the runner's position (it needed to be looped over the runner's left shoulder). You could argue that the ball, as thrown, should have been caught, but in my view, under the circumstances (that is, runner out of the running lane -- see 6.05(j)), this is a clear-cut call.

Interference has to be with the fielder taking the throw. If the runner blocked a catchable throw it's interference. But if the throw got there and the fielder dropped it - tough.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote