The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 01:50pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by w_sohl
I thought from the OP that the ump was in the outfield grass...
Deep B is on the edge of the infield grass. Regular B used in 2-man and some 3-man situations but is not used in 4-man mechanics. I don't know the term for U2 standing in the outfield when there is no one on base or R3 only. I guess it's called "standing in the outfield."

Last edited by SanDiegoSteve; Sat Aug 23, 2008 at 01:54pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 03:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Deep B is on the edge of the infield grass. Regular B used in 2-man and some 3-man situations but is not used in 4-man mechanics. I don't know the term for U2 standing in the outfield when there is no one on base or R3 only. I guess it's called "standing in the outfield."
Steve, I think it's refered to as "the pasture" or E.

Last edited by JR12; Sat Aug 23, 2008 at 03:41pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 07:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
I'm by no means an authority on four man mechanics. But there was no mention in the OP of there being any runners at the time of the incident. Seems to me, and apparently I'm wrong, that with no runners on base - the second base umpire would be positioned behind the fielders.


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 08:51pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
I'm by no means an authority on four man mechanics. But there was no mention in the OP of there being any runners at the time of the incident. Seems to me, and apparently I'm wrong, that with no runners on base - the second base umpire would be positioned behind the fielders.


Tim.
Well Timster, I must fill you in then:

A) The OP mentioned that it was a RBI single, which means there was someone somewhere on a base.

B) Deep B is an infield position, not the outfield, which I just found out is called "The Pasture," or "E." So in "Deep B," U2 is in front of the fielders, so the batted ball is dead if it hits him.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 11:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Well Timster, I must fill you in then:

A) The OP mentioned that it was a RBI single, which means there was someone somewhere on a base.

B) Deep B is an infield position, not the outfield, which I just found out is called "The Pasture," or "E." So in "Deep B," U2 is in front of the fielders, so the batted ball is dead if it hits him.
Thanks, Steve. I completely missed the RBI mention...........


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 24, 2008, 01:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 371
Sorry guys, I just realized by the confusion I forgot to mention in the Op there was R1 and R2.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 07:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 224
Glad Ed Rapuano on good old Cowboy Joe's crew was not hurt.

Concerning the "tie" issue. I thought that was something worn with a suit.

I believe rule 609 j and 708 e contradict each other by saying the runner must "beat" the throw in one, and the other says the throw must "beat" the runner. This was maddening to a philospher (Eric Bronson) who was reading the Rule Book, when he found that the ball and runner arriving at the same time could be ruled either way.

I imagine (just guessing) the umpires pick one or the other interpretation and stick with it for the bang-bang (or banger) play, or maybe they let the "play" decide the one used. A good fielding play would be rewarded in the fielders favor and a poorly fielded play in the runners favor. I'm sure you guys who are friends with the MLU and MiLB and DIV 1 can expound on this if you haven't on plenty of other posts in the past.

Palmer keeps ball hitting ump alive, Morgan gives the tie to the runner, and McCarver doesn't like McClelland's slow strike call. What's next?

But what do I know. I just put the ball on the tee and watch out for kids throwing the bat and try not to get hit.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 09:02pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by tballump
I believe rule 609 j and 708 e contradict each other .
That would be 605 (j). I like 7.08 (e) much better.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 23, 2008, 10:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by tballump
I imagine (just guessing) the umpires pick one or the other interpretation and stick with it for the bang-bang (or banger) play, or maybe they let the "play" decide the one used. A good fielding play would be rewarded in the fielders favor and a poorly fielded play in the runners favor. I'm sure you guys who are friends with the MLU and MiLB and DIV 1 can expound on this if you haven't on plenty of other posts in the past.
Umpires don't see "ties" and then decide which ruling to choose from or base a call on how well or poorly a fielder played a ball. Umpires see a sequence of events and then rule on what happened first. THERE ARE NO TIES.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 25, 2008, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by waltjp
THERE ARE NO TIES.
There are at least 25,000 LL parents who would (loudly) disagree with you.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 25, 2008, 05:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 611
Send a message via Yahoo to umpduck11
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMan
There are at least 25,000 LL parents who would (loudly) disagree with you.
Not to mention coaches......
__________________
All generalizations are bad. - R.H. Grenier
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yankees-RedSox game today. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Baseball 6 Mon Jul 07, 2008 06:21pm
Interference in the Yankees-Royals game? greymule Baseball 12 Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:08am
Yankees @ Angels - Game 5 ALDS UMP25 Baseball 45 Thu Oct 13, 2005 07:33pm
Balk call in O's/Yankees game gotblue? Baseball 13 Wed Jun 29, 2005 01:19pm
Orioles/Athletics Game Aug 16 LDUB Baseball 3 Tue Aug 17, 2004 05:43pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1