|
Wed Jul 02, 2008, 06:24am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once and for all--INT on foul pop
I don't have a Jacksa tome, nor time to unearth an interp. So I am going to this august body for your input. Assume MLB rules.
R3, 1 out. B1 hits popup near 3B line. F5 draws a bead on the rock. R3 wanders off the base and unintentionally interferes with F5, who would have caught the ball with ordinary effort (this is a given, as is the INT). The ball's trajectory is such that if it had been caught, it would have been foul. The ball lands foul and stays there. You now where I'm going with this. If R3 is declared out, what happens to B1? Maybe some of you have seen this a bazillion times; I haven't. It was a hypothetical brought up by one of my gang. Ace in CT
__________________
There is no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shooting Foul with Technical Foul / How Many FTs? | rgncjn | Basketball | 5 | Mon Jan 08, 2007 03:29am |
| Personal Foul, then Technical Foul | jdw3018 | Basketball | 7 | Sat Dec 02, 2006 05:35am |
| Foul tip caught, foul ball, or out? | bossman72 | Baseball | 9 | Sun Jul 09, 2006 11:03pm |
| offensive foul, defensive foul or no call? | thereluctantref | Basketball | 2 | Mon Mar 13, 2006 01:12pm |
| Anger over referee's foul calls triggers a bigger foul after game | BktBallRef | Basketball | 10 | Mon Mar 06, 2006 02:36am |
Threaded Mode
