NFHS Rules Changes 2009 (Sort of)

#3 (permalink)

Mon Jun 30, 2008, 07:30pm

Toadman15241 Toadman15241 is offline

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 132

I wish this was a joke. Unless you are an idiot, you knew the intention of all 4 rule "clarifications." What ump would not eject a pitcher for "pitching" at a batter? Who would have kept a batter at the plate if calling a ball four when he made no attempt to get out of the way? It seems as though the NFHS is in a race to the bottom. Sad.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
You sort this out...	ca_rumperee	Basketball	10	Sun Feb 24, 2008 06:07am
Actually, sort of, maybe on topic	rainmaker	Basketball	10	Tue Nov 01, 2005 09:59pm
Here's one to sort out (NFHS)	FredFan7	Football	6	Thu Aug 19, 2004 06:40am
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee)	KWH	Football	27	Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am
New.....sort of....	stripes1977	Football	2	Thu Aug 09, 2001 08:19am

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39pm.