Quote:
Originally Posted by Toadman15241
I wish this was a joke. Unless you are an idiot, you knew the intention of all 4 rule "clarifications." What ump would not eject a pitcher for "pitching" at a batter? Who would have kept a batter at the plate if calling a ball four when he made no attempt to get out of the way? It seems as though the NFHS is in a race to the bottom. Sad.
|
Surprisingly (or perhaps not), there was some discussion on this play on another forum with some members saying that it became a "no-pitch" since the rule didn't specifically say ball four.
Lah me indeed.