The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2008, 11:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewUmpinCT
In between innings, I went to discuss both scenarios with my partner and he agreed he blew the call on loudly insisting batter is out. No problem there, however, the defensive coach comes over and rants about blow call allowed run to score in a close game...
How, exactly, did he blow this call? While its good preventive umpiring to say "he's out" in this situation, it is incumbent upon the players to know the situation and the relevant rule. Don't confuse failing to use preventive umpiring and extending courtesies with blown calls, the two are different.
__________________
Tony Carilli
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2008, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Milford Ct
Posts: 12
Point taken

Thanks TCar... Bad choice of wording (ducking that left hook), but in my teachings I was told to just let it be known by saying batter is out. Eliminates any doubt although I know the players and coaches need to know the rules also.

And yes it actually happened two batters in a row... Never can tell what you will see in HS ball...

But on the bases loaded scenario 2 outs, the catcher can't simply tag home can he?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2008, 12:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewUmpinCT
But on the bases loaded scenario 2 outs, the catcher can't simply tag home can he?
Yes.
__________________
Tony Carilli
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2008, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewUmpinCT

But on the bases loaded scenario 2 outs, the catcher can't simply tag home can he?
Yes he can

We have bases loaded 2 outs and the batter became a runner on an uncaught third strike.

The runners by the fact that the batter became a runner are forced to advance, hence all F2 needs to do is touch home plate.

It's no different then if B1 hit the ball to F4 who simply stepped on second base to get the force out on R1.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2008, 12:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Milford Ct
Posts: 12
Thanks for the clarification

Guys thanks for clearing that up in my mind. I didn't look at it that way and I didn't actually see it in the NFHS rule book (unless I missed it... Is it referenced there?)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2008, 09:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewUmpinCT
Guys thanks for clearing that up in my mind. I didn't look at it that way and I didn't actually see it in the NFHS rule book (unless I missed it... Is it referenced there?)
Hint: Look at all the conditions where a batter becomes a batter-runner.

Then, look at all the rules governing runners (and how they are put out).

Now, put the two together...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 23, 2008, 10:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewUmpinCT
I didn't actually see it in the NFHS rule book (unless I missed it... Is it referenced there?)
Yes it's referenced in the FED rule book

FED rule 2.29.3 Definition of a Force

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 24, 2008, 04:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 323
Send a message via AIM to aceholleran
If I see F2 about to make a play to 1B on a third strike where B1 does not become a runner. I verbalize once: "Batter's out." Once again, I do this only when B1 runs to first and F2 pops up likes he's gonna hurl the horsehide.

It's not to make myself feel better; it's to avert a fugly sitch where all heck breaks loose.

I don't feel this is aiding the defense.

Harrumph.
__________________
There is no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strike three in the dirt ruling? voiceoflg Baseball 13 Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:50pm
Dropped 3 Strike on pitch in dirt Mista Bone Baseball 13 Mon Jun 27, 2005 01:10pm
Can a ball in the dirt be a strike? WestMichBlue Softball 23 Thu Aug 07, 2003 09:54pm
dirt robert Baseball 5 Fri Aug 02, 2002 08:43am
Strike 3 in dirt Robert G Baseball 6 Wed Jul 18, 2001 05:27am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1