![]() |
|
|||
FED Going to Mouth
In the "Preseason Guide" for baseball it is clearly stated "With a runner or runners on base, a pitcher who has engaged the pitcher's plate and goes to his mouth has committed a balk."
Case book 6.2.1 Situation B clearly indicates a pitcher has balked if while touching the pitcher's plate in the set position with runners on base he places his hand on his mouth and distinctly wipes off his pitching hand prior to touching the ball. This year the rule book has as a "Point of Emphasis" going to the mouth and clearly says "going to the mouth while in contact with the pitcher's plate is a balk, not because the pitcher goes to his mouth, but because the action simulates the start of the pitching motion." I've got the above ammunition to back up my calling of a balk in the above situations. Where is the justification in the rules book though? The newly "clarified" shaded text in the Penalty of 6-2-1e doesn't support a balk. I suspect your answer will be that the "simulates the start if the pitching motion" interpretation along with "continue the motion without interruption..." and "go to the set positon without interruption..." blah blah are all the reasons I need but I am not satisfied. Going to the mouth doesn't look like the start of the pitching motion to me. Is it sufficient for something to be clearly stated in the case book but not in the rules book to justify a call? |
|
|||
I've got the above ammunition to back up my calling of a balk
I wouldn't be too jacked up about calling that play a balk just because it's in the rules...but as you said, you now have a "point of emphasis" to back you in enforcing that rule... You are correct and I agree...that "going to the mouth" is not the reason it's a balk...but can simulate the beginning of the pitching motion...so I would use that as your test for a calling the balk or warning F1... I've heard other sides too that say...if you're going to warn, now you have to warn everybody, otherwise, you have now subjected yourself to a protestable situation if you warn one team and balk the other... food for thought.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
And,
I would also like to comment that the rules interpretations posted on the NFHS website and the overhead presentation are also considered "official interpretations" by the National Federation of State High Schools.
Regards, Tim Christensen NFHS publication Committee "High School Today" |
|
|||
Lapopez, let me reword your situation a bit:
F1, while touching the pitcher's plate in the set position with runners on base Is this a balk and why? |
|
|||
separating your hands simulates the start of the pitching motion...
my answer, yes, balk. Unless the cap adjustment is very early on and considered preliminary movement
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
The FED online clinic makes it clear that FED considers going to the mouth while in contact with the rubber is a balk for going to the mouth while in contact with the rubber, not for simulating a pitching motion.
I don't know why wording wasn't added or clarified in 6-2-4 to reflect this. Among the POE in the rulebook, the Casebook and the online clinic, we appear to have three different wordings regarding this rule. Since we need to pass a quiz on the online clinc with a score of 100% to be "Certified", we have gone with the clinc interpretation. While FED has had its share of rulebook issues, they do have an advantage over OBR. In FED we have access to a process to fix the mistakes. The OBR has had over 200 mistakes for years. I'm having dinner with the Washington chief FED rules interpreter this evening. I'm typing up my proposal for next year to take with me.
__________________
GB Last edited by GarthB; Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 11:34am. |
|
|||
Quote:
FED 6-1-3 For the set position, the pitcher shall have the ball in either his gloved hand of his pitching hand. His pitching hand shall be down at his side or behind his back. Before starting his delivery, he shall stand with his entire non-pivot foot in front of a line extending through the front edge of the pitcher's plate and with his entire pivot foot in contact with or directly in front of the pitcher's plate. He shall go the the set position without interruption and in one continuous motion. He shall come to a complete and discernible stop (a change of direction is not considered an acceptable stop) with the ball in both hands in front of the body and his glove at or below his chin. ... |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Correct the RB doesn't handle this very well. Blame the OBRs, it starts there, it's a rag. If you start baling pitchers pre-set for every little movement, you had best get ready to balk them when they roll their finger asking for a new or repeat set of F2 signs.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day." ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Exactly, a good pitcher has to learn that to do anything legally, just disengage the rubber. Why take a chance that you might get away with it one game, and then have it called a week later in a different area, game etc., Thansk David |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Out the mouth of babes. | Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. | Baseball | 13 | Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:18pm |
Going to the Mouth | blueump | Baseball | 4 | Tue May 22, 2007 06:10am |
Keep Your Mouth Shut! | TXMike | Football | 1 | Sat Sep 09, 2006 06:58pm |
going to mouth | smoump | Baseball | 15 | Thu Mar 23, 2006 04:09pm |
from the mouth of coaches..... | ChrisSportsFan | Basketball | 19 | Fri Dec 02, 2005 05:54pm |