The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 1.00 average. Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
The NFHS overheads are FINALLY quite clear on this issue.

With a runner on base and F1 goes to his mouth, not mattering if it is the set or the wind-up position, it is a balk.

The rule clarification for 2008 made the going to the mouth situation simple.

If F1 is not in contact with the pitcher's plate he can go to his mouth as long as he wipes.
TEE will you do some preventative umpiring on ths issue?

In other words you see F1 do this

Are you going to

1. Simply call the infraction
2. Dust off the plate and tell F2 to talk to F1 and NEXT time it is a balk or
3. if you are BU tell any infielder to talk to F1.

I am interested in how "other" associations instruct their umpires on these "ticky/taky? type rules. Similar to the "old days" when in FED F1 could not check a runner. How many associations enforced that rule.

Thanks TEE

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Twp

R1, F1, off the mound, goes to his mouth, without wiping off he grips the ball. He now can _____________.
__________________
GB
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 01:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

Garth,

Request Time and ask for a new ball.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM)
Garth,

Request Time and ask for a new ball.

JM
More TWP:

And, if he wipes off after gripping the ball and then takes the rubber?
__________________
GB
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 02:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
More TWP:

And, if he wipes off after gripping the ball and then takes the rubber?
Same answer as above, i'm going to ask for the ball and replace it.

Thansk
David
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

David,

In Garth's second sitch, you would, no doubt, add a ball to the batter's count as well, yes?

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2008, 11:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
As long as he's off the mound.

BTW, Rita, did you notice the title of this thread?
Yes dear. And you have no idea how often I have this conversation with my brothers in blue every year. You would be another one. So many have it wrong. This is as good as any thread to have this discussion.

Even if he is on the mound, even if he is in contact with the rubber, it's not ever a balk or an illegal pitch in OBR. It's a ball to the batter, period.

It's one of the differences I wish people would get.

Rita
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2008, 08:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rita C
Yes dear. And you have no idea how often I have this conversation with my brothers in blue every year. You would be another one. So many have it wrong. This is as good as any thread to have this discussion.

Even if he is on the mound, even if he is in contact with the rubber, it's not ever a balk or an illegal pitch in OBR. It's a ball to the batter, period.

It's one of the differences I wish people would get.

Rita
Well, hon, the discussions that I've had with my brothers and sisters in blue have concerned not the type of violation but whether F1 can go to his mouth AT ALL.

That I why I emphasized that it is legal provided that he's off the mound. In my post I did not specify what kind of violation it was, so please don't correct me for an error I did not make.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2008, 01:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
[QUOTE=PeteBooth]
Quote:

TEE will you do some preventative umpiring on ths issue?

In other words you see F1 do this

Are you going to

1. Simply call the infraction
2. Dust off the plate and tell F2 to talk to F1 and NEXT time it is a balk or
3. if you are BU tell any infielder to talk to F1.

I am interested in how "other" associations instruct their umpires on these "ticky/taky? type rules. Similar to the "old days" when in FED F1 could not check a runner. How many associations enforced that rule.

Thanks TEE

Pete Booth
You know, if the coaches are dumb enough to lobby for this rule, it should be called. Everytime. Maybe then we can get rule 6 rewritten sensibly.

I have a modest proposal for a language change.

"FED Rule 6, see OBR Rule 7.00"
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2008, 08:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Well, hon, the discussions that I've had with my brothers and sisters in blue have concerned not the type of violation but whether F1 can go to his mouth AT ALL.

That I why I emphasized that it is legal provided that he's off the mound. In my post I did not specify what kind of violation it was, so please don't correct me for an error I did not make.
I wrote:

Remember all, in OBR, it is not a balk or illegal pitch for a pitcher to bring his hand to his mouth.

You then wrote:

As long as he's off the mound.

That makes it sound to me like you were saying it could be either of the two if he were on the mound. Even if he is on the mound or on the rubber, it is neither a balk nor an illegal pitch in OBR if he brings his hand to his mouth. It is always a ball to the batter.

Do we agree on that?

Rita
  #56 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2008, 08:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rita C
Even if he is on the mound, even if he is in contact with the rubber, it's not ever a balk or an illegal pitch in OBR. It's a ball to the batter, period.

It's one of the differences I wish people would get.

Rita
F1 finishes his stretch, comes to a complete stop. He then goes to his mouth. Ball? (Well, you did say "it's not ever a balk.")
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2008, 08:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock
F1 finishes his stretch, comes to a complete stop. He then goes to his mouth. Ball? (Well, you did say "it's not ever a balk.")

In this case it's not a balk for going to his mouth. With runners on it's a balk for breaking his hands without disengaging.


Tim.
  #58 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 25, 2008, 12:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigUmp56
In this case it's not a balk for going to his mouth. With runners on it's a balk for breaking his hands without disengaging.


Tim.
Exactly.

Rita
  #59 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 25, 2008, 12:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Yes I agree, but it's just another example of FED re-inventing the square wheel. They emphasize that the penalty for going to the mouth while on the rubber is a ball rather than a balk, but, with men on base, going to the mouth while on the rubber will ALWAYS result in a balk (from either pitching position), because it is an arm movement not associated with the pitch.

It's like having Professor Irwin Corey as the rules interpreter, assisted by Norm Crosby.
  #60 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 25, 2008, 12:53pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock
Yes I agree, but it's just another example of FED re-inventing the square wheel. They emphasize that the penalty for going to the mouth while on the rubber is a ball rather than a balk, but, with men on base, going to the mouth while on the rubber will ALWAYS result in a balk (from either pitching position), because it is an arm movement not associated with the pitch.

It's like having Professor Irwin Corey as the rules interpreter, assisted by Norm Crosby.
By Jove ole mate, I've think you've hit upon something. A pitcher cannot balk unless there are runners in place to lap the bases. Pip, pip ole chum.


Cheerio,
ST
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test questions, part 3 ChuckElias Basketball 16 Wed Sep 07, 2005 01:48am
Test questions, part 1 ChuckElias Basketball 12 Fri Sep 02, 2005 05:37am
Test Questions-NF devdog69 Volleyball 19 Wed Aug 24, 2005 01:07pm
Test questions SouthGARef Football 10 Fri Sep 17, 2004 09:50am
Questions from the test devdog69 Volleyball 14 Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1