The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 09:21am
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
NCAA and now FED Obstruction

In NCAA it is considered obstruction if you block a basepath without the ball and impede the runner. The same is now true in FED. Here's the play for you to rule on:

B1 hits a ground ball to F5. He fields it and throws wildly to the home plate side of first base. F3 jumps for the ball - which goes over his glove - into the path of B1 and they collide. Obstruction? Live ball or dead ball? What about other runners (if any)?

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 09:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 662
Send a message via AIM to johnSandlin Send a message via Yahoo to johnSandlin
I am going to pass on calling obstruction because the catcher got pulled because of the bad throw.

You can't punish the catcher for a bad throw.

I say live ball and play on.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 09:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ
The same is now true in FED.
seriously?? is this a change for '08??
__________________
It's sad when you're at a baseball game and realize that you'll never have the money, status or talent that the guys on the field take for granted. And it gets even worse when the grounds crew gives way to the players.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 09:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpLarryJohnson
seriously?? is this a change for '08??
Yes. Try to keep up. The changes (or at least a press release about them) are on the NFHS web-site.

I'd just have a train wreck in NCAA. I'd like to rule the same way in FED, but according to RefMag (and I know they aren't official, and there are often errors in each issue), it's obstruction under the new FED rule.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 09:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
This is obstruction.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 11:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
This is obstruction.
well now i guess it is
__________________
It's sad when you're at a baseball game and realize that you'll never have the money, status or talent that the guys on the field take for granted. And it gets even worse when the grounds crew gives way to the players.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 11:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
I'd just have a train wreck in NCAA. I'd like to rule the same way in FED, but according to RefMag (and I know they aren't official, and there are often errors in each issue), it's obstruction under the new FED rule.
Assuming the overthrow remains in play, what's your award?
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 11:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Viewing the new FED rule "as written", this would be obstruction. However, I want to see some official case book interpretations on this type of play.

Regards
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 11:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Assuming the overthrow remains in play, what's your award?
And assuming RefMag was correct, it depends on what happens next, but at least one base -- just like all FED obstruction. Since this happened before BR reached first, the "minimum award" is first.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 01:48pm
ggk ggk is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 140
is a FED source cited in Ref Mag?? is this the official interp? if so, this is ridiculous.

this should be a no call - trainwreck
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 02:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
And assuming RefMag was correct, it depends on what happens next, but at least one base -- just like all FED obstruction. Since this happened before BR reached first, the "minimum award" is first.
Good, that's what I was thinking, too.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 02:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Virgin Gorda
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ
In NCAA it is considered obstruction if you block a basepath without the ball and impede the runner. The same is now true in FED. Here's the play for you to rule on:

B1 hits a ground ball to F5. He fields it and throws wildly to the home plate side of first base. F3 jumps for the ball - which goes over his glove - into the path of B1 and they collide. Obstruction? Live ball or dead ball? What about other runners (if any)?

JJ
Did F3 have the ball? No
Did he block the basepath? Yes
OBS.

FED - live ball
Other Rs, advance at will.
Award 2B? Probably
__________________
"The size of the mind is proportionate to the ability to challenge the norm. "
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 10:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggk
is a FED source cited in Ref Mag?? is this the official interp? if so, this is ridiculous.

this should be a no call - trainwreck
They cited some FED rules guy -- Kanaby or Hopkins, iirc..
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 10:47pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
I've got an email in to Eliott Hopkins to ask for an "official" interp. When it comes I'll pass it along.

I didn't think the NFHS had an online rulebook, even if you were an NFHS member. Guess I'll have to investigate this one, too!

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 11, 2007, 11:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ
I've got an email in to Eliott Hopkins to ask for an "official" interp. When it comes I'll pass it along.

JJ
This should be interesting. In previous years Elliot has repsonded to such questions by referring the questioner to his/her state interpreter. National
spoke only with state clinicians.

Let us know how this goes.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASA obstruction David Emerling Softball 10 Thu May 03, 2007 05:38pm
NCAA Obstruction jicecone Baseball 5 Fri Jun 10, 2005 03:14pm
Oh Yes! Obstruction Again whiskers_ump Softball 4 Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:06pm
Obstruction at First Cubbies87 Baseball 9 Sun Sep 28, 2003 07:53pm
Obstruction? buddymoran Softball 13 Sat Apr 05, 2003 01:08pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1