![]() |
|
|||
|
that's what my original thinking was before talking it out last night. his point was that the runner stopped running due to being obstructed and went back to 1B. if e hadn't been obstructed, he would have kept going and there would never have been an opportunity for the int. therefore, at the conclusion of the play, he would have awarded the runner such to make it so that the obstruction was rectified, sending him to 2B. i'm going to send him the video and see what he has to say about it. it may take awhile, but i'll post when he gets back to me.
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Coach's Interference? | Armadillo_Blue | Baseball | 13 | Tue Aug 08, 2006 01:41am |
| coach's interference | NavyCoach | Baseball | 8 | Wed Jun 15, 2005 01:35pm |
| Interference v. Obstruction | Dougie | Softball | 14 | Tue Apr 16, 2002 08:54pm |
| Obstruction and Interference | spots101 | Baseball | 6 | Sun Mar 03, 2002 02:32pm |
| Interference, Obstruction or nothing. | Gre144 | Baseball | 10 | Thu May 17, 2001 07:27pm |