![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Did Larry Barnett Rule Correctly | |||
Yes, Contact was incidental |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 73.33% |
No, Armbrister did interfere with Fisk. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 26.67% |
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
Found the rule...
Wonder if this was in the rules in 1975?
Rule 7.09(i) Comment: When a catcher and batter-runner going to first base have contact when the catcher is fielding the ball, there is generally no violation and nothing should be called. “Obstruction” by a fielder attempting to field a ball should be called only in very flagrant and violent cases because the rules give him the right of way, but of course such “right of way” is not a license to, for example, intentionally trip a runner even though fielding the ball. If the catcher is fielding the ball and the first baseman or pitcher obstructs a runner going to first base “obstruction” shall be called and the base runner awarded first base. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interference? Maybe! | WestMichBlue | Softball | 14 | Fri Aug 26, 2005 01:31pm |
Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
Interference? | DownTownTonyBrown | Softball | 17 | Mon Mar 31, 2003 06:22pm |
interference | refjef40 | Softball | 12 | Fri Mar 21, 2003 09:31am |
Interference | Larry | Softball | 5 | Thu Jun 06, 2002 09:31am |