Interference?

DownTownTonyBrown · #1 (**permalink**) Fri Mar 28, 2003, 12:56pm

My wife was working a FP game and the following situation ocurred. What's your call?

2 outs, R1 (1st), R2 (2nd). Batter swings and misses 3rd strike, catcher drops the ball in front of her (behind the plate in foul territory). Batter heads for first and drops the bat down near the plate. The bat contacts the ball and knocks it well away toward the dugout. Nothing intentional - the batter was not even aware the ball had been contacted again. What would you do?

greymule · #2 (**permalink**) Fri Mar 28, 2003, 01:53pm

Bat hits ball: interference, intentional or not.

Ball hits bat, not interference.

TwoBits · #3 (**permalink**) Fri Mar 28, 2003, 04:06pm

FED ruling:

8-2-6: [The batter-runner shall be called out when] the batter-runner interferes with a fielder attempting to field a batted ball, interferes with fielder attempting to throw the ball, intentionally interferes with a thrown ball while out of the batter's box, makes contact with a fair batted ball before reaching first base, or (F.P.) INTERFERES WITH A DROPPED THIRD STRIKE.

Intent appears to have nothing to do with it. Ring her up.

DownTownTonyBrown · #4 (**permalink**) Fri Mar 28, 2003, 05:20pm

This was a ball in foul territory. The batter was still in the box. The catcher had already had opportunity to field the ball - it hit her mitt and she then dropped it. It was not a potential foul tip - a swing and a clean miss.

Yes, the bat hit the ball... in foul territory.

Still stand by your answers?

IRISHMAFIA · #5 (**permalink**) Fri Mar 28, 2003, 05:55pm

Quote:

Originally posted by DownTownTonyBrown
This was a ball in foul territory. The batter was still in the box. The catcher had already had opportunity to field the ball - it hit her mitt and she then dropped it. It was not a potential foul tip - a swing and a clean miss.

Yes, the bat hit the ball... in foul territory.

Still stand by your answers?

DTTB,

Fair or foul territory, the ball is in play. Catcher having an opportunity to catch it is irrelevent, the ball is in play.

I would stand with Greymule's assessment.

Steve M · #6 (**permalink**) Fri Mar 28, 2003, 07:13pm

Interesting, I can see several possibilities on this play. If we're under ASA rules, it's very clear - intent is assumed when the bat hits the ball - dead ball, interference, and an out. Fed, however, is different, in Fed, we've got to judge intent when the bat hits the ball on a batted ball, doesn't say anything about a muffed ball - and that's what this is. If we are under Fed rules for this, I believe I've got a live ball. If we're under ASA, I've got interference.

Steve M

TwoBits · #7 (**permalink**) Fri Mar 28, 2003, 09:23pm

Intent is not mentioned in the rule I mentioned earlier. I stand by my judgement.

By the way, in FED baseball, if the described play was unintentional, the ball is live.

DownTownTonyBrown · #8 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 01:42am

I think maybe twobits got this correct. I've had time to do a little research...

Rule 7-3-6 Batting Infractions. ... If a whole bat is thrown and interferes with a defensive player attempting a play, interference shall be called. PENALTY: the batter is out and runners return. If, in the umpire's judgement, interference prevented a possible double play, two may be declared out.

Rule 8-2-6 Batter-Runner is Out. The batter-runner shall be called out when: the batter-runner ...(F.P.) interferes with a dropped third strike. If this interference, in the umpire's judgement, is an obvious (here's the intent) attempt to prevent a double play, the runner closest to home plate shall be called out. PENALTY: ... The ball is dead and runner(s) must return to the last base touched at the time of the interference.

SteveM I'm going to check out the rules fro FED baseball. There might be similar rules. If you have references as to why it would be a live ball, please share them. Thanks everyone.

BTW My wife says she was stumped for a while then decided her best choice was to call it a foul ball... oops. Without this research, I might have done the same thing.

CecilOne · #9 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 09:29am

I don't think 7-3-6 applies because a normal drop of the bat by the batter is not "thrown". And as it is not a batted ball, 7-4-1-k does not apply, either. Therefore, the only rule that applies is 8-2-6.

Steve M · #10 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 09:31am

Here's a section of Jon Bennett's softball rules differences book that deals with the bat hitting the ball:

Bat hits ball
Note: if the bat is still moving after being released and it hits the ball, this is considered the bat hitting the ball and is usually interference (see below). If the ball rolls against a bat on the ground which is not moving, it is considered the ball hitting the bat and is not interference unless intentional.
ASA, NCAA Â— batter interference; the batter is out; the ball is dead (A:7-6J; N:9-9a2)
FedÂ— not interference unless intentional (7-4-1k) (Referee magazine interpretation)

Like I said in a couple of different posts, if you work ASA, Fed, and/or NCAA, this book is a gold mine.

Steve M

CecilOne · #11 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 09:40am

I think "FedÂ— not interference unless intentional (7-4-1k) (Referee magazine interpretation)" does not apply as it is not a "batted ball". Also, RM is not authoritive.

Where can I get the Jon Bennett's softball rules differences book?

Steve M · #12 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 10:00am

Cecil,
You may be right about the application.

Here's Bennett's email address:

[email protected]

I think I mispelled his name earlier, first name is John - not Jon.

Steve M

IRISHMAFIA · #13 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 10:01am

Quote:

Originally posted by Steve M
Here's a section of Jon Bennett's softball rules differences book that deals with the bat hitting the ball:

Bat hits ball
Note: if the bat is still moving after being released and it hits the ball, this is considered the bat hitting the ball and is usually interference (see below). If the ball rolls against a bat on the ground which is not moving, it is considered the ball hitting the bat and is not interference unless intentional.
ASA, NCAA Â— batter interference; the batter is out; the ball is dead (A:7-6J; N:9-9a2)
FedÂ— not interference unless intentional (7-4-1k) (Referee magazine interpretation)

Like I said in a couple of different posts, if you work ASA, Fed, and/or NCAA, this book is a gold mine.

Steve M

Steve,

ASA 7.6.J deals with a batted ball. This scenario does not include any batted balls.

I think too many people are confusing this with contacting a batted ball twice as opposed to interfering with the catcher's ability to make an out.

IRISHMAFIA · #14 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 10:15am

ASA POE 23.C.3:

IF A BATTER SWINGS AND MISSES THE PITCHED BALL BUT:

3. Hits the ball after it bounces of the catcher or his mitt, the ball is dead, and all runners must return to the base they occupied prior to the pitch. (FP and 16" SP Only) in (2) and (3) if the act is intentional with runner on base, the batter will be called out for interference. If this occurs on strike three in fast pitch, Rule 8.2.F has precedence.

ASA 8.2.F:

BATTER-RUNNER IS OUT:

F. ..discards their bat which prevents the defense from making a play on the ball, or (Fast Pitch Only) interferes with a dropped third strike.

Either one of the above rules this batter-runner out in the given scenario. No intent is inferred or required.

IRISHMAFIA · #15 (**permalink**) Sat Mar 29, 2003, 10:20am

Quote:

Originally posted by DownTownTonyBrown

Rule 7-3-6 Batting Infractions. ... If a whole bat is thrown and interferes with a defensive player attempting a play, interference shall be called.

Does this mean that if you throw only part of the bat, the rule doesn't apply?