The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 15, 2003, 05:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 166
I was behind the plate in Fed. ball with one out and a runner on first.The batter hits a grounder to shortstop and the s.s. takes it runs to second steps on the bag and then double clutches and doesn't throw to first.My partner kills it and yells interference saying the s.s. couldn't make a throw because the runner was coming towards her without sliding.I'm not saying he was wrong I just want to be sure other people make that call.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 15, 2003, 06:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
If she didn't throw, no one interfered with the throw.

And let's not give anyone the idea that you have to slide, as opposed to other forms of avoid.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 15, 2003, 07:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
I probably do not have interference on this play, based on the description given. In order for this retired runner to have interfered, she must have done something intentionally and I did not read that there was intent by the retired runner. I'm pretty sure that Fed covers this in Rule 8, Section 6 - dunno which Article. Fed matches ASA on this. The reason that the retired runner must do something intentional to interfere is that the runner is not expected to dissolve or disappear.

Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 15, 2003, 08:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13
Steve M is right on. I do not have any interference as the runner did not intentionally interfere with the play. The real question exists if the fielder threw the ball and hit the retired runner. Even though the runner could be hit, if the runner did not intentionally make contact with the ball, no interference. Now, judgement comes into play big time...is it judged to be intentional if the retired runner just stands there and makes no attempt to get out of the way. I think it could be. You really need to be there on a play like this to make the determination.

Bob 13
__________________
Bobby
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 16, 2003, 12:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 166
I thought the same as you guys when this happened I was just further away so I didn't question my partner.The girl seemed to just be running towards second like she is supposed to did nothing intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2003, 07:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 190
Thumbs down

I have to agree. No interference unless she did something intentional.

Well had my first games yesterday. It's great to be back. Felt like I have been working all year.

I love this game.

__________________
Bob
Del-Blue
NCAA, ASA, NFHS
NIF
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2003, 12:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Del-Blue
I have to agree. No interference unless she did something intentional.

Well had my first games yesterday. It's great to be back. Felt like I have been working all year.

I love this game.

You probably didn't know it, but I was watching
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2003, 07:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
Oh, No, Mike was lurking!



glen

BTW, did he have a good game?
__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2003, 08:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by whiskers_ump
Oh, No, Mike was lurking!



glen

BTW, did he have a good game?
Of course, he did. Only stayed the first 3 or 4 innings of the first game. They keep the seats in the shade and it wasn't that exciting to keep me warm.

Delaware took two from Dartmouth, but the twilight game went 9 innings. I'm gonna have to collect some beer on that one.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 17, 2003, 09:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
ROFL

Does that mean Bob's plate game went 9? I'd wanna collect a few beers on that one too.

Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 18, 2003, 06:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 190
Talking

Mike,

No I didn't know you were there. BJ actually told us both good games. Thanks for the kind words. My thighs are sore today.

And NO guys, It wasn't my plate game that went 9 innings.

And, Andy bought me beer oopps, I mean adult beverage after the game.

Another DH today, and one tomorrow if id doesn't rain.

Later
__________________
Bob
Del-Blue
NCAA, ASA, NFHS
NIF
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 18, 2003, 06:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
ROFL

Does that mean Bob's plate game went 9? I'd wanna collect a few beers on that one too.

Steve M
Actually, I'm not sure which game went 9 innings since the local paper doesn't really note the games in any particular order.

His partner was the same guy I worked the Men's Major Church NC with a few years back who took a game 11/12 innings then had the nerve to tell the hosts (Alabama) umpires that he NEVER goes extra innings. So my guess is that Bob was on the bases for the long one.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 21, 2003, 09:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
At last, a field dry enough to play on, after three postponements. Just a scrimmage with mediocre teams and working by myself, but it went well and no aches or pains afterward. Might have missed a call at 2nd when I couldn't get the angle to tell if the SS had control, but otherwise OK.

BTW, for those who are interested, the NFHS officials forum is back in operation.

[Edited by CecilOne on Mar 21st, 2003 at 08:34 AM]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1