![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
BUT, he must retouch on the caught fly, or he's liable to be out on appeal. AND, once he retouches, the award is one base from 1B, that's 2B. IIRC, enforcement changed recently for situations like this. But any way you do it, it appears you help somebody. "You, go retouch, and then go to 2B!" -- You've helped the offense. "You, 3B!" OR "You, 2B!" -- You've made it seem as if he does NOT need to retouch, which helps the defense if they know to appeal.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
When awarding bases, it is up to the runner (or his coach) to know he must retouch a base left too soon. I would never tell a runner to retouch. Simply say "You, 2nd base". If he fails to retouch 1st Base, he would be out on appeal.
|
|
|||
Quote:
If you reply, "1B is the last base legally touched, coach," you've given the game away.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
Quote:
If the coach does not know the rules that is his problem. The ball is dead on the player going into the stands. Runners are entitled to move up one base. If R1 fails to retouch first and is appealed he is out. Then you can explain the rule to the coach, or invite him to the next rules interpretation clinic. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me? |
|
|||
He was past second when the ball went dead
His last legally obtained base was first base since the ball was caught on the fly. If he stays on second without retouching ihe s in jeopardy of being called out on an appeal. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me? |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
He's rounded 2nd, the award is 3rd. Not my problem if he doens't fulfill his obligation to re-touch (before he touches 3rd). I,m not out there too second guess if the D is gonna appeal, nor am I guessing the O isn't trying to steal one. Award the base and rule on the result/s. Once everyone see's the out call on the catch, their supposed to know what to do, retouch, if less than two outs. Would a runner fail to retouch if he was scrambling back to 1st to do so, when the ball went past the F3 and OOP, probably not. Even if you called "time" and awarded 3rd before, he had re-touched. Might confuse em, but only once, I'm sure. They should also know the runner can retouch on a dead ball, as long as he hasn't touched the next base, after the ball is dead. And if he does touch the next base and still goes back and retouches, I sure ain't stopping him there either, that's the defenses job to know he can't, and to make a proper appeal. Not Ump: "whoa there base runner where you going"? BR: "Ah, back to re-touch sir". Ump: "No you can't, because you've already touched the next base after the call of time on a DB". Or Ump: "You second". BR: "But sir, that's a one base award, I already touched 2nd". Ump: "I know, but you left early and have to retouch, so I can only make you go backwards, to the base you already touched, cause if I let you keep going, you'll still be subject to appeal at 1st. Just none of our business IMO. Make your award and rule on any developments.
__________________
SLAS |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
You're killing it?
Quote:
Stay away from "Time, you on 3B, go back to 2B." or "Time, you on 2B, stay at 2B." I would signal the out on the catch and keep quiet. The base coaches better instruct R1 to 1B because there are not many baserunning options open for them. I would signal the 2nd out upon proper appeal at 1B or for a tag. |
|
|||
SAump:
Would you endorse not saying anything other than "catch" until the runner retouches 1st, then award 2nd? A bit of preventive umpiring by not saying anything? Or is that too much prodding and allowing the runner a way to get back to first even if he's stupid (and his coaches). |
|
|||
Sticky ruling
Quote:
LL Myth 17. The runner gets the base he's going to, plus one on a ball (carried or) thrown out-of-play. Last edited by SAump; Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 12:33am. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Catch or no catch(foul ball)? | illiniwek8 | Baseball | 2 | Sat Mar 25, 2006 07:16pm |
No tag after catch | ozzy6900 | Baseball | 3 | Mon Oct 04, 2004 08:27am |
To catch, or not to catch; the coin, that is... | chiefgil | Football | 13 | Wed Aug 11, 2004 06:40am |
Catch or No Catch? | soonerfan | Baseball | 8 | Thu Jun 12, 2003 03:37pm |
NEW CATCH NO CATCH | soonerfan | Baseball | 2 | Thu Jun 12, 2003 03:24pm |