The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 09:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Yes. The ruling about "balking and throwing the ball wild" (or whatever the specific words are) is meant *only* for those situations where the act of throwing itself is illegal and, thus, a balk.

In this sitiation, you had a balk for feinting without a step FOLLOWED BY a disengagement and a wild throw. It's two separate moves, so the balk is enforced.

Had, for example, F1 merely thrown the ball away without stepping (just turned his shoulders and threw the ball into center field), then the play would be kept live.
So Bob, are you saying that F1 balked to second base?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 09:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Nope, sorry, he balked for starting and stopping. But thanks for playing.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 09:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Nope, sorry, he balked for starting and stopping. But thanks for playing.
Bob said, "In this situation, you had a balk for feinting without a step FOLLOWED BY a disengagement and a wild throw. It's two separate moves, so the balk is enforced."

He indicated that the balk was because of the feint without a step not for starting and stopping.

Are you indicating that he was starting to pitch and stopped??? Or starting to feint a throw to second and stopped. (which would technically be called a balk to second wouldn't it??)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 10:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by tibear


Are you indicating that he was starting to pitch and stopped??? Or starting to feint a throw to second and stopped. (which would technically be called a balk to second wouldn't it??)
"Technically" this is a balk for beginning a pitch [separating hands w/o a step toward a base first] and not delivering. Bob can describe it as he did w/o violence to the principle of IIITBTSB because he [Bob] knows the difference. Those who do not [understand the difference] need to stick with the mantra IIITBTSB, so that they don't invent non-existent balks [a favorite of the "balk to 2d" crowd is the throw to SS at his position].
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 10:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
What constitutes a "feint" is a step + not throwing. Without the step there's no feint, just a balk for starting and stopping.

I had a game last week with one of our association's notorious Smitties, who urged me three times to review the "rule" that says F1 can't throw to F5 away from the base (with R3).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balk question ToGreySt Baseball 34 Tue Nov 28, 2006 09:42am
balk question ygyo Baseball 8 Fri Jun 02, 2006 07:29pm
Question of a Balk GerryBlue Baseball 1 Wed Mar 24, 2004 01:32pm
To Balk Or Not To Balk, That Is The Question.. chuckfan1 Baseball 21 Wed Sep 03, 2003 03:21pm
Balk Question CDcoach Baseball 11 Fri May 23, 2003 05:16pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1