The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 14, 2007, 04:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Im not one to criticize, but there's no way the first clip doesn't show a strike.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 14, 2007, 04:58pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
I don't think any Pitch Track or Questec or anything else is needed to see that that pitch was strike 3.

There were other pitches which drew ire from both teams, not just the Padres. This one though led to runs scored that otherwise would not have, at a time when SD was up 4 to 3. Of course, they then pulled Maddux, put in some scrub, and ended up getting hammered and losing.

Maddux must have said he was mad at himself because he has too much class to say what he really thought of that awful call.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 14, 2007, 05:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMan
Im not one to criticize, but there's no way the first clip doesn't show a strike.
Cuzzi had been inconsistent with that pitch all night. He often called it a strike to left-handed hitters when he was closer to the inside corner, and often called it a ball to right-handed hitters when further away from the outside corner.

As I said before, I think that inconsistency was a result of his positioning which was too low. When it was an outside corner pitch, he likely couldn't see it all the way into the mitt because the catcher's head was in his way. He was unable to perceive the late movement that Maddux always puts on that pitch, and so he mostly called it a ball. But when it was an inside corner pitch, he could see the late movement just fine and called it a strike.
__________________
Jim Porter
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 14, 2007, 06:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 477
Send a message via AIM to nickrego
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaliix
I watched most of the game and Welke's zone was erratic. He missed more than a few pitches and was getting complaints from both sides.
I'll take your word on that.

As I said, I only saw a few pitches in the highlights, but what I saw was good.
__________________
Have Great Games !

Nick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hints on plate stance LakeErieUmp Baseball 32 Wed May 03, 2006 12:09pm
Plate Stance Blue37 Baseball 1 Fri Mar 31, 2006 01:31pm
Stance behind the plate CentralINRef Baseball 13 Sat Mar 12, 2005 06:31pm
plate stance archer Softball 8 Thu May 27, 2004 09:01am
Plate Stance?? Just Curious Softball 5 Wed Mar 20, 2002 11:49am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1