The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2007, 02:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpire99
FED rules. R1 & R2 with two outs. Batter hits a deep fly ball to right center field. The two fielders converge and the center fielder dives for the ball. BU signals out as the ball is hitting the ground and the right fielder is picking it up and throwing it in. Batter ends up on second and both runners score. We confer and I (PU) tell him that I the ball was not caught. Where do we place the runners?
You do not do anything with the runners.

You have R1/R2 2 outs so the runners are off with the pitch.

R1/R2 both score and the BR is at second base.

You do nothing as there is nothing to do.

This is what I think you meant.

Quote:
R1 & R2 with ONE out. Batter hits a deep fly ball to right center field. The two fielders converge and the center fielder dives for the ball. BU signals out as the ball is hitting the ground and the right fielder is picking it up and throwing it in. Batter ends up on second and both runners score. We confer and I (PU) tell him that I the ball was not caught. Where do we place the runners?
If that's the case you could have a can of worms on your hand. On a deep fly to right centerfield the runners are probably 1/3 to 1/2 way between their advanced to bases. The BU said No catch so they in all likelyhood kept running and scored. Now the defense is going to appeal that the runners left early to get out number 3.

After you now REVERSE the call to a catch in HS using FED rules you cannot place either team at a disadvantage. Therefore the BR is out number 2 and put R1/R2 back to their TOP bases.

OBR has no such provision other then 9.01(c) in which case the results would be the same. R1/R2 back to their TOP bases with 2 out.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth

Last edited by PeteBooth; Mon Mar 26, 2007 at 02:33pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2007, 04:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
reversing a catch/no catch with multiple runners will probably cause more problems than it solves...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2007, 07:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
reversing a catch/no catch with multiple runners will probably cause more problems than it solves...
Agreed. It's on the NCAA list of "things not to change" (okay, that's not the exact title).
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 26, 2007, 09:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MSN
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Agreed. It's on the NCAA list of "things not to change" (okay, that's not the exact title).
Bob, we had this play discussion last year at the AOA meetings. Once the catch/out is called there's no going back. Out stands.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two Runners at First cmcramer Baseball 7 Wed Aug 16, 2006 01:44pm
Runners return? your boss Baseball 5 Tue Jun 06, 2006 08:01am
Two runners on same base? fan Softball 3 Thu Apr 27, 2006 07:54pm
Runners on first and second rodneyw Baseball 6 Sun Mar 12, 2006 08:05am
2 runners on third base strike4 Softball 4 Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:42pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1