![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
bluehair,
Actually, no. The running lane proscriptions only apply to plays being attempted at 1B. I applaud the fact that you are actually reading the rules. As you have discovered, there are a number of ambiguities (not to mention occasional contradictions) in the text of the rules. If this stuff interests you, I would encourage you to obtain a copy of the BRD, which is probably the best source of authoritative interpretations to clarify these ambiguities and contradictions for FED rules. http://shop.officiating.com/x/product/brd2006 I might add that I, personally, am waiting for the 2007 edition before ordering another copy. (I'm fairly certain that I am not the only one.) But I already have one. JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all. |
|
|||
|
JM,
I knew that argument was weak, but... This is my first year working Fed rules. The intricacy is in that intent is not required for a FPSR, but it is if it is not a force. Thanks for your patience. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interference? | tzme415 | Softball | 4 | Mon Jan 30, 2006 09:33pm |
| Interference? | bossman72 | Baseball | 16 | Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:29pm |
| Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
| INTERFERENCE?? | IndianaUmpRef | Baseball | 13 | Fri Jun 07, 2002 07:39pm |
| Interference | Larry | Softball | 5 | Thu Jun 06, 2002 09:31am |