Swinging 3rd Strike Call

[mcrowder]

Originally Posted by left coast

I have a hard time calling a strike (especially strike three) on a pitch that hits me in the shin guards and the catcher has to run to the backstop to get. That pitch should be called to reflect what it looks like.

You and PDX are either idiots (and from other things I read, I doubt this is the case), or are completely or deliberately misunderstanding the sitch posted that got you to respond.

The ball didn't go directly from pitcher, through the zone, to the shinguards. It hit the mitt first. A pitch could be a cockshot and for some reason the catcher flubs it and it hits your shin - you gonna call this a ball?

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by mcrowder

You and PDX are either idiots (and from other things I read, I doubt this is the case), or are completely or deliberately misunderstanding the sitch posted that got you to respond.

The ball didn't go directly from pitcher, through the zone, to the shinguards. It hit the mitt first. A pitch could be a cockshot and for some reason the catcher flubs it and it hits your shin - you gonna call this a ball?

I'm not going to call a cockshot a ball unless the catcher completely bails out and lets me catch it. But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

[BigUmp56]

I couldn't agree more. How the catcher handles those borderline pitches is a critical factor in helping me define my zone.


Tim.

[BigUmp56]

This thread's been up for the better part of the day and I've yet to hear anyone try to explain why we don't verbalize "out" on a routine swinging strike three.


Tim.

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by BigUmp56

This thread's been up for the better part of the day and I've yet to hear anyone try to explain why we don't verbalize "out" on a routine swinging strike three.

Well, what are you waiting for? I'm sure you're just dying to tell us!

[bossman72]

Yes Tim, please enlighten us.

I have a person i work with all the time that says "Strike 3 batter's out!" all the time and it annoys the heck out of me.

Lay the reasons down on us so i know what to tell him to stop him from doing it! haha

[BigUmp56]

Originally Posted by bossman72

Yes Tim, please enlighten us.

I have a person i work with all the time that says "Strike 3 batter's out!" all the time and it annoys the heck out of me.

Lay the reasons down on us so i know what to tell him to stop him from doing it! haha

It's been ingrained into me that we don't verbalize the obvious. Think about it. He just went down swinging. He knows it, his teamates know it, the defense knows it, and if the fans are paying any kind of attention they know it too. I also feel there is an element of showing the player up when he goes down swinging.

This is like screaming "foul ball" when a ball is hit straight back over the backstop. It's kind of a pointless exercise.


Tim.

[NIump50]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

I'm not going to call a cockshot a ball unless the catcher completely bails out and lets me catch it. But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

If reds on black or top on bottom I prefer the catcher to stick it
but if it's inside of that it's a strike regardless of what the catcher does.

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by NIump50

If reds on black or top on bottom I prefer the catcher to stick it
but if it's inside of that it's a strike regardless of what the catcher does.

Agreed.

[Justme]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

......... But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

That's right. I want to give you the strike, help me by doing a good job of catching the pitch.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

I'm not going to call a cockshot a ball unless the catcher completely bails out and lets me catch it. But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

Sometimes that's the coach's (nice) way of saying, "Call the pitch, not the catch, please."

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Sometimes that's the coach's (nice) way of saying, "Call the pitch, not the catch, please."

I've never had a coach ever ask why I didn't call a botched catch a strike yet, and if one ever does question it, I'll tell him it takes a catcher and a pitcher to make a strike.

I am talking about extreme borderline pitches which I was considering calling a strike, but the catcher made it look horrible and way off the plate. I just feel that the catcher should have made a better effort to help his pitcher.

[nickrego]

Originally Posted by mcrowder

You and PDX are either idiots (and from other things I read, I doubt this is the case), or are completely or deliberately misunderstanding the sitch posted that got you to respond.

The ball didn't go directly from pitcher, through the zone, to the shinguards. It hit the mitt first. A pitch could be a cockshot and for some reason the catcher flubs it and it hits your shin - you gonna call this a ball?

Either way, it's very difficult, for an experienced pitch caller, to call a ball on the ground a strike. Especially when the catcher had to reach for it. (Catcher set up outside, ball tails inside, per original post)

BALL