The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 20
Question

11/12 LL blowout. B1 choking up mightily against dominating fast pitcher. B1 swings early and awkwardly at high, inside change-up, combining with F2 popping up to block my view. Ball dribbles towards F1, who throws to F3 for the out. Offensive coach calls time and asks what the call was and why it wasn't HBP. I tell him I didn't see contact, only the fair ball result. I ask BU what he saw and he replies that he saw the bat strike the ball. Play stands without any guff and is inconsequential to the game's outcome.

Between innings, BU mentions that it was a weird, slow-motion play and he saw the ball hit both her hands and the bat, but that the hands are part of the bat! I know that theory is wrong, but it gets me thinking about the play. Should it make any difference whether the ball first hit the bat and then the hands, or vice versa? Assume an x-2 count. If the ball discernably hit the bat first and then the hands (say rolling down the barrel an inch or two before contacting the hands), shouldn't it be a simple foul ball with the batter contacted while in the box? Then the batter lives to see another pitch. Alternatively, if the hands were out front and the ball hit them first before glancing off the bat itself, shouldn't it be strike 3? (I'm assuming that the dropped 3rd strike on such a play is a nullity because the ball is instantaneously dead when it contacts the batter.)
__________________
There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 03:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
I had one recently where the ball clearly "dinged" against the metal bat but also pinched the kid's finger painfully. No question it hit both bat and hand, virtually simultaneously. Dribbler to F1. I let it stand, but I don't really know what the right call should have been.

Horatio
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 03:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 168
Send a message via ICQ to AlabamaBlue
If it hits hands then bat, dead ball strike. If it hits bat then hands, foul ball.

To keep it clear in your head, replace the hands with any other part of the body. If it hit her foot and then hit the bat, what would the call be? If it hit the bat and then her foot, what would the call be? The hands are a part of the batter and are treated the same as any other body part.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 03:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 50
Quote:
If it hits hands then bat, dead ball strike. If it hits bat then hands, foul ball.


If hand, then bat - Would it be a foul as I could not see this as the third strike causing an out?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 04:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 168
Send a message via ICQ to AlabamaBlue
Again, what if it would have hit her leg, arm, head, or any other body part while she was swinging?

A pitched ball that strikes the batter anywhere on the body is an immediate dead ball. Anything that happens after it hits the batter has no bearing on the ruling. If the batter was swinging when she got hit, then it's a strike. Period. If she already has 2 strikes on her, that's strike 3 and she's out.

Why can't you see it being strke 3?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 04:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 50
If she misses the ball, then yes, strike three and batter out. But ball hits any part of her body, as she swings and somehow connects with the ball (fair or foul), then it's foul ball/ dead ball. If two strikes already, then no out.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 04:38pm
LT LT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 29
Thumbs up

We have strike 3.....Alabamablue got it correct...
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 04:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 168
Send a message via ICQ to AlabamaBlue
Quote:
But ball hits any part of her body, as she swings and somehow connects with the ball (fair or foul), then it's foul ball/ dead ball. If two strikes already, then no out.
Why? Is this from a rule book, or just the way you think it should be?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 05:17pm
JEL JEL is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 910
Per ASA

ASA Rule 8, section 1. THE BATTER BECOMES A BATTER-RUNNER
F. (Fast pitch only) When a pitched ball not swung at nor called a strike touches any part of the batter's person or clothing. It does not matter if the ball strikes the ground before hitting the batter. The batters hands are not to be considered a part of the bat.
EFFECT
1.The ball is dead. The batter is entitled to one base without liability to be put out.
EXCEPTION: If no attempt is made to avoid being hit, the batter will not be awarded first base unless it is ball four.
2.If batter is hit anywhere on the body, including the hands, while swinging at the pitch, the ball is dead and a strike is called. If it is strike three, the batter is out.

If the out had not been made, the defensive coach would have been the one to question it, if he knows the ruling.
It is difficult to see hit hands, and I'm still amazed at the number of people who think the hands are part of the bat (umpires included!)

ALSO Foul Ball (ASA definition) F.
Touches the batter or the bat in the batter's hand(s) A SECOND TIME while the batter is within the batter's box.

[Edited by JEL on Jul 7th, 2003 at 05:23 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 07, 2003, 11:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 50
Quote:
Why? Is this from a rule book, or just the way you think it should be?
The rule book says 'while swinging' it would be a strike. It does not differentiate between swing/miss and swing/connect, so your ruling (strike three) seems accurate.
Thanks for the clarification.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1