![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't have a politically correct bone in my body. There is a definite difference between PC and condescension. |
|
|||
|
Imho ..........................
Quote:
I find it difficult to believe that someone who has 77 posts in ANY of these forums would not quickly realize that he's "in" on the "joke". Also, umpiring and positive public relations do not go together ! We are universally reviled. Part of the deal. Condescending ? Here ? Heaven forfend !!!! Doug |
|
|||
|
Quote:
1. This is an open forum, and anyone may post anything they wish within the limits of the forum. 2. Political correctness is beside the point. It is not your place to guide the content of what others wish to post. 3. If you do not like what others post, you may of course complain. If you feel that a poster has been mistreated, you may address the mistreatment in a post of your own - both to soothe the "victim" and to chastise the "victimizer." Feel free to state your opinions, and permit others the same freedom. 4. Create your own PR, if you wish, but many of us don't think that we're promoting this forum, officiating.com, or anything else by posting here. As another poster intones: this is just my opinion.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
|
JHMO, but I still see nothing wrong with mild chastising of someone coming here to ask a question that is so simple it's obvious he never actually checked the book. A person with a rules question will learn WAY more from looking for and finding the appropriate rule than he will by just asking it here and getting the answer. If he checks the book and can't get the answer (perhaps not sure of which rule applies), fine, no problem.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson |
|
|||
|
mbyron,
Hopefully you read the baseball rule book with a bit more clarity than you read my post. Quote:
If you read the post you quoted, it specifically said "merely suggesting" that's hardly guiding the content. Quote:
I didn't and I did. Thank you for your permission to do so. Quote:
By that I meant create positive public relations for umpires in general. I did not intend to imply we should be promoting this forum or officiating.com. I think all but one on the forum understood what I meant. Are you always this clueless or do you have a particular dislike for me that blinds you to common sense? Wow!! You know, talking down to others and calling names does have a certain appeal to it. I'm feeling pretty good about myself. To heck with this proper decorum stuff, LET THE BASHING BEGIN!! Actually let the bashing continue is more like it. Now Byron you have something to complain about because I've just given an edict that the bashing can continue. I have usurped authority on this forum and am giving permission to everyone to continue the bashing. In fact, now that my eyes have been opened to the joys of condenscension, I hereby give all posters permission to use said techniques in any fashion necessary to inflate egos to whatever size necessary to satisfy themselves. And you Mbyron I give you permission to respond to this post however you see fit. Really go ahead. When I tire of controlling this forum I'll let you know, perhaps you can give it a try. It's bunches of fun. |
|
|||
|
Ni ..................
Now don't get upset, but, you've been here since March and posted 90-something times and you are just realizing that there is a certain degree of ball breaking that goes on here ? And, other than a few sworn enemies, its just done with humor, if not wit. (Maybe half-wit
)I think your sensitivity to your fellow man is admirable, but here it is misplaced. Doug |
|
|||
|
As long as everybody's just havin' a little fun, I though I'd throw my 2 cents in.
In the time I have been a reader of this forum, I have found the young Dr. Byron's behavior to be "above reproach". Well, except for the time he recently gently "chided" me , of course, when I misspoke (not in a "baseball" sense, but in a "proper logic" sense) in a post on another thread. Now after thinking about it (for an embarrassingly long time, I might add), I realized his point was correct; and, though I tried, I was unable to think of a suitable "comeback". So... Michael, I'm sure you realize that it is not polite to correct your elders in a public forum. Let's mind our manners. In terms of the appropriateness of the IP's question on this forum, I am of like mind with those who have expressed opinions that it is somewhat inconsiderate to post a question that could easily be answered by looking at a rulebook or using the "search" feature on the forum. Further, if you do post such a question, you probably shouldn't be surprised (or feel you have been treated unjustly) if you catch a little flak. In the case of dsimp8, I am personally inclined to cut him (her?) a little slack, because a brief review of his previous posts leads me to believe that he is primarily involved with softball, much of it "slow-pitch". Under some codes governing that game, I believe that a pitch which hits the ground before reaching the plate is considered dead and cannot be batted. (I could, of course, be wrong about that. And NO, I didn't bother to look.) I would be similarly inclined were a cricket umpire to come to this board and ask a question about the hand being part of the bat. From that mind-set/perspective, it would be a perfectly reasonable question, and such a person could diligently research the text of the rules and remain puzzled on the question. One thing that has surprised me in reading this forum is how thin-skinned and prone to meaningless, endless argument some of the umpires who post in this forum are. I would suggest that such attributes are not the characteristics one would look for in a good umpire/umpire candidate. Perhaps they are exhausted by their efforts in maintaining a perpetual, stoic calm under any and all circumstances in the games they officiate, and they come here to "vent" or "unwind" as a release. In closing, I see the issue of "Political Correctness" has been raised. I was wondering if any of you had seen the following.... The man in the middle, wearing a fabulous vintage chiffon-lined Dior gold lame gown over a silk Vera Wang empire waisted tulle cocktail dress, accessorized with a 3-foot beaded peaked House of Whoville hat, along with the ruby slippers that Judy Garland wore in The Wizard of Oz, is worried that the Da Vinci Code might make the Roman Catholic Church look foolish. ![]() JM Last edited by UmpJM; Wed May 24, 2006 at 04:41pm. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 Last edited by bob jenkins; Thu May 25, 2006 at 07:25am. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have no problem busting the balls of the know it alls on this board, in fact most of the time it's quite easy. I was just asking that we cut slack to those asking a rules question. Simple request, obviously not recieved well, my feelings aren't hurt. And to Tim C Good job. That's the kind of condescending post I was talking about. Feels good doesn't it? After a bad game you can just come on the board and talk down to a few guys and erase that insecurity right away. When you have a really bad game and you look foolish you might have to come in here and really let loose. I think calling out a troll or two might do it, but you've already figured that out haven't you? You can use me as a whipping boy anytime that insecurity flares up. I hope game number 3902 turns things around for you. You know what they say.....If at first you don't succeed......... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ball hitting the knob of the bat | softball_junky | Softball | 6 | Mon May 01, 2006 10:58am |
| Ball Hitting Top of backboard | Vernon | Basketball | 6 | Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:12pm |
| SP (ASA) Ball hitting batter..... | dsimp8 | Softball | 4 | Tue Sep 14, 2004 07:09pm |
| Fed. bat hitting the ball 2X | Rachel | Softball | 17 | Thu May 15, 2003 10:52am |
| hitting the ball w/foot out of box! | duckump | Baseball | 10 | Mon Feb 04, 2002 11:48pm |