Thu May 18, 2006, 01:53pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CoachJM
1. calmly requested time and, after granted, politely asked you if you had seen the contact between the runner & fielder (sounds like you did)
2. asked you if, in your judgement, the fielder was making a legitimate attempt to field the ball at the time of the contact & was the player who had the best play on the ball (sounds like he was)
3. suggested that, as he understood the rules, the runner should be called out for interference because 7.09(l) says he should if he "fails to avoid" the fielder in this situation (which it does).
Assuming after all of that, you informed the coach that your initial ruling was going to stand and he then informed you he was protesting your ruling, thanked you for entertaining his appeal, and promptly returned to the dugout.
|
Funniest stuff Ive seen all week. You'd sooner see world peace than this sequence of events from a coach......heck, why not posit the Second Coming while you are at it? 
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
