|
Wed Apr 05, 2006, 12:00am
|
|||
|
|||
|
looking for the intent of the rule....
Fed 7-3-5: Batter Interference
Penalty: When there are two outs, the batter is out. When there are not two outs and the runner is advancing to home, the runner is out. When there are not two outs and the runner is advancing to second or third, the batter is out, and runners are sent back to the base they were on at time of pitch. Question: Why do we call out the runner going home and not the runner going to second or third (less than two outs)? I am simply looking for the intent of the ruling. Any help is appreciated. 
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rule vs. Intent - Run and Shoot | waltjp | Football | 3 | Tue Dec 14, 2004 01:27pm |
| The INTENT of the rules | MJT | Football | 12 | Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:15am |
| Intent to hurt | jking_94577 | Basketball | 23 | Tue Mar 04, 2003 02:53pm |
| Intent to Deceive? | rainmaker | Basketball | 11 | Mon Dec 30, 2002 04:49pm |
| Intent of the Rule | PeteBooth | Baseball | 14 | Wed Jan 10, 2001 12:31pm |
Threaded Mode
