![]() |
|
|||
punish the offender
I think the intent here is to prevent the offense from intentionally interfering so a run can score - perhaps a game winning run.
If you call out the runners on 1st or 2nd, and the runner going home is allowed to score, you have rewarded the offense with a run - and only trading an out for the run. Coaches might do that in a close game knowing they could get a run for an out automatically. Again, what if is tied in the bottom of the 7th, bases loaded and 1 out. Everyone is on the move ( knowing the coach has " the play " on ) and the batter interferes. By calling anyone out but the runner coming home, you have essentially rewarded the offense with a win for an illegal act. This is my take on the rule reasoning for calling the runner headed home out. I could be way " off base ". ![]()
__________________
Tony Smerk OHSAA Certified Class 1 Official Sheffield Lake, Ohio |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rule vs. Intent - Run and Shoot | waltjp | Football | 3 | Tue Dec 14, 2004 01:27pm |
The INTENT of the rules | MJT | Football | 12 | Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:15am |
Intent to hurt | jking_94577 | Basketball | 23 | Tue Mar 04, 2003 02:53pm |
Intent to Deceive? | rainmaker | Basketball | 11 | Mon Dec 30, 2002 04:49pm |
Intent of the Rule | PeteBooth | Baseball | 14 | Wed Jan 10, 2001 12:31pm |