The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 09:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Would someone be good enough to describe/define the Gerry Davis stance for me? Several posters say they prefer it, so I want to try it.

I tried the slot but could not get used to it. In that position, I simply cannot see the pitches right, especially on the outside, so I have consistently worked "over the top." That may be because I started with the outside balloon protector, which pretty much dictated the "over the top" position.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 09:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Dover, DE
Posts: 103
Send a message via Yahoo to Delaware Blue
Go here. http://childress.officiating.com/ There are two articles about the Gerry Davis stance by Mr. Childress under Working the Plate.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 04:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 21
The Stance

Your standing approximately 1 to 1.5 arm's lengths behind the catcher. Your feet are planted wider than shoulder width (when I experimented with the stance, I was about 8 inches more than shoulder width on each side). You keep your head straight forward, and put your hands on your knees.

In general, umpires like the stance because it gives you a good "still" view of the zone with nearly zero movement on your part (due to the hands on knees). The stance is quite similar to the one knee, in that you get the same 'look.'

Why my exposure to the Gerry Davis stance was only experimental?

I felt that it changed my strike zone (enough for coaches and players to notice in some cases). I also could not get the outside or low pitches the same; possible due to my neglect to really learn all aspects of the stance. Furthermore, I was hit with a substantial amount of foul balls because I was a greater distance from the catcher. I did a two-week study of the stance, and was hit with more foul balls on my hands/arms that I had in the previous four seasons.

I would NOT suggest this stance, however there are advantages.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 06:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
Re: The Stance

Quote:
Originally posted by umpandy
I also could not get the outside or low pitches the same; possible due to my neglect to really learn all aspects of the stance.
yes, it is because of your neglect to learn about the stance, so your recommendation to not use the stance holds no water at all. im not even sure why you made it in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 09:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 79
Re: The Stance

Quote:
Originally posted by umpandy
I did a two-week study of the stance, and was hit with more foul balls on my hands/arms that I had in the previous four seasons.

I would NOT suggest this stance, however there are advantages.
How many games during the two week study? I started using GD system at the end of the HS season in 2004 and did about 100 plate games that summer and fall. That was my evaluation period.

A senior umpire in our association tried it for PART OF AN INNING, said he felt detached from the game and for that reason, he would recommend that it not be used by any umpire in the association.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 09:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
The Davis System

I have used the Davis system for about 3 years now, since being introduced to it by Gerry at a clinic. This is trully a "system" as opposed to just a stance. There are several keys to making it work.

1) You must work the slot in the GD System, there is no option. Besides, who doesn't work the slot anyway? Remember there is a difference between positioning and stances. If you try to use the slot with a balloon you will not see the low or outside pitches. Get rid of the balloon (highly recommended), or work over the top.
2) With the GD System, you must work higher and farther back from the catcher. This attracts the attention both of coaches and observers. They will get used to it.
3) The GD system puts your head at a consistant height from the first pitch to the last, because your arms don't change length during a game!!
4) This system provides a rock solid lock in mechanism for your head. If the hands on knee set works so well on the bases, why not the plate? Plus the fatigue factor is very nearly eliminated, you are consistant from beginning to end.
5) A hint if you have neck pain after the first game or two. Be sure to "drop your seat" as the pitcher is just about to release the ball. This does two things, it prevents that pain and it also brings the eyes up and allows a better look at the pitch. We have enough "pains in the neck" during the game, we don't want to give ourselves one.

Why do the coaches seem to notice your strike zone? Thats simple, because you have such a good view of the zone that you are calling strikes that you missed before.

As for UmpAndy getting hit by foul balls, its not because of being too far back. There are more than likely mechanical reasons, and a good evaluator, partner or clinic instructor will find out and fix it. I have found since using the GD System, I DO NOT GET HIT, period! Probably twice in 4 years. This is probably because I am doing higher level ball, but also because I am not moving around so much.

Sorry for the long post, but this is a subject that is near and dear to my heart.

Bob P.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 15, 2005, 10:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 21
Re: Re: The Stance

Quote:
Originally posted by briancurtin
Quote:
Originally posted by umpandy
I also could not get the outside or low pitches the same; possible due to my neglect to really learn all aspects of the stance.
yes, it is because of your neglect to learn about the stance, so your recommendation to not use the stance holds no water at all. im not even sure why you made it in the first place.
I cannot disagree with you there; maybe my neglect to actually learn and study the stance did have an effect on why it did not appeal to me. However, it was not simply the low/outside pitches, it was being hit so much.

Now, the only question I have (and it is a QUESTION, rather than an implication), how come few Major League Umpires use the Gerry Davis stance if it is so beneficial? AGAIN... that's a question, and a serious answer is greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 16, 2005, 01:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
UmpAndy, don't worry, I'm a gentleman poster. Not like some around here who will jump your butt for asking a question. I understand you are asking a serious question.

First, why don't many MLB umps seem to be switching to the GD? Well, there are a few, and there seems to be a few that switch every season. Remember, these guy are AT the top, they aren't struggling to get there. They have little incentive to change something that has worked very well for them in the past. There are only two stances that MLB umps use, a box or a variant of that, or the scissors. Only two or three are using the knee.

So, for a long answer to a short question, if a MLB ump feels that he needs to "fix" his current plate approach, he may look at the GD. I think once they go GD they don't go back.

B. Patrino
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 16, 2005, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
I think as guys keep working with Gerry more of them convert. In the last two years at least Mark Carlson and Doug Eddings have switched, and I'm sure there are more I can't think of.
__________________
Throwing people out of a game is like riding a bike- once you get the hang of it, it can be a lot of fun.- Ron Luciano
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 16, 2005, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 21
Thanks!

That's all I was looking for, and it does make sense. In other words, why would something that is not universal become universal overnight? Another example of this is the hockey masks (I know everyone hates this one). But, it isn't that the mask is neither good nor bad, but it is that these umpires have never worked with a different mask, and have no reason to change at this point in their career.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 20, 2005, 08:41am
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
I was admiring the plate umpire's perfection of the Gerry Davis system last night in the final game of the NL series. Rock solid lock on every pitch, and he looked so comfortable. Then it dawned on me - it's Gerry Davis...
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 20, 2005, 08:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally posted by DG
I was admiring the plate umpire's perfection of the Gerry Davis system last night in the final game of the NL series. Rock solid lock on every pitch, and he looked so comfortable. Then it dawned on me - it's Gerry Davis...
tee hee.

I was impressed with the solidity of the low strike, especially with Oswald painting the knee (if I can say that).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 20, 2005, 09:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 662
Send a message via AIM to johnSandlin Send a message via Yahoo to johnSandlin
Davis, Barrett, and Rapuano love to work the knees when they are working the plate.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 20, 2005, 01:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
Ed and Ted work the same stance- and it is not the knee.

mbyron- In my first few years of umpiring I had a lot of problems with pitches near the knees. I switched to the GD and I can say that it has helped my sight of the knees incredibly...I get almost no cr@p about it anymore. I guess my point is that I can attest to your point from experience.
__________________
Throwing people out of a game is like riding a bike- once you get the hang of it, it can be a lot of fun.- Ron Luciano
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 20, 2005, 02:34pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
One problem I have seen from many umpires I work with is that they only call strikes where the ball is above the knee. The zone goes to the hollow beneath the knee, and any part of the ball can go through that line. So a ball that can appear to be below the knee can be a strike. Every coach who has seen me work will tell his players that I will call a low strike so be swinging. I guess they are right.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1