NFHS new Case Play - The Official Forum

#7 (permalink)

Mon Jan 08, 2018, 11:27am

Rich Ives

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Aug 2000

Posts: 3,236

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

You can not "say he's out on strikes," without also "reading anything into the case, and without making any assumptions, and without adding anything that isn't there."

Your point that the case could be better written is valid.

The case said it was changed to strike 3. The case did NOT say it was uncaught. So saying out on strikes is true unless you read into the play and assume that it was uncaught.

__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NFHS case play list?	oc	Basketball	23	Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:17pm
Is NFHS Case Book Play 2.10.1 Sit. G(d) (re: corr. error situation) really an error?	rpirtle	Basketball	3	Wed Dec 24, 2008 03:25pm
NFHS Case Play 10.4.5 Situation E page 84	Robert E. Harrison	Basketball	15	Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:21pm
What about Case Play 10.8-1?	Dakota	Softball	4	Sun Nov 16, 2003 01:54pm
NFHS 2002 Case book play 1.5.6	Mike Simonds	Football	11	Mon Mar 03, 2003 12:45pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49am.