![]() |
|
|||
Oh brother...
Quote:
If they were considered an undergarment, they would be illegal because they extend below the pants/skirt. Therefore, the color wouldn't matter. |
|
|||
Quote:
UNIFORMS — LOGO.. 3.6.1 SITUATION: A6 enters the game with an excessive manufacturer’s or school’s logo on his/her: (a) socks; or (b) wristbands. RULING: Legal in (a). In (b), A6 may not participate and is directed to return to the bench until legally equipped. COMMENT: The restriction on visible manufacturer’s or school’s logo size is in effect on pants/skirts, compression shorts, wristbands and headbands. The shoes and socks are not considered part of the uniform for purpose of visible logo size. |
|
|||
So they can come out with anything they want too written on their socks and no matter what color they are or how stupid they look we can't say anything at all, pitiful! I'm like MOofficial though, just give it time, they will have something about them soon!
![]()
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE! |
|
|||
The NFHS Ruled On Tattoos, Why Not Socks ???
Several years ago the NFHS came out with a rulings about "offensive" tattoos. I'm sure that if a team came out with socks with vulgar, or in some other way, offensive (racial, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, etc.), writing on them, that we could find some NFHS rule, or interpretation, to apply and penalize.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Quote:
We have girls in this area who wear the Dr. Seuss socks. ![]() |
|
|||
Found It, Now Where Are My Keys ???
1996-97 NFHS Basketball Rule Book, page 70, Points of Emphasis: Permanent tattoos pose problems if they are objectionable for one reason or another. School administrators and/or coaches have an obligation to have objectionable markings of a permanent type covered. It is not in the best interest of the game to have officials placed in a position where from game to game they must rule on what is objectionable. Obviously, officials can and will make these decisions when outright vulgarity or obsenity is involved or when such markings violate sportmanship and/or taunting or baiting regulations.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
As other guys have said you don't go check but if teams come out with 2 boys wearing a white undershirt and 4 wearing green and another 1 wearing black then it's pretty easy to tell. Don't look for it but if its obivious take care of it is how I look at it.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Socks | closely_guarded | Basketball | 4 | Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:29am |
Socks. | hbioteach | Basketball | 31 | Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:13am |
Socks | johnnyg08 | Baseball | 19 | Mon Apr 23, 2007 03:13pm |
Socks? We don't need no stinkin socks!!!!!! | sm_bbcoach | Football | 6 | Mon Aug 30, 2004 03:54pm |
socks | johnfox | Basketball | 10 | Tue Dec 18, 2001 10:19pm |